Loving My First Artificial Implant, All Hail the Titanium Seer!

Breaking News: The Seer of Forbidden Truth is pleased and proud to announce his physiology has been permanently altered via the addition of titanium.

Titanium, baby!

Before you get your titties all aflutter, allow Me to elaborate: We are talking dental implant. Just recently, I completed My first ever dental implant, for a single tooth.

Thanks to the Sacred Family Unit version of universal child abuse, I did not begin brushing My teeth until the age of 14, and did not floss or use mouthwash until my early 20’s. As you might imagine, My teeth did not respond well to this mistreatment, resulting in extensive, and expensive, and ongoing, restoration work. Even with all that, Ted Bundy would still be well within his rights to mock My zigzaggingly crooked tooth arrangements…but at least I don’t leave bite marks…

Ahem, I digress. Where was I? Oh yeah, so, one of My beloved teeth got so bad recently, it had to be extracted. A little less of Me for Me to love. ūüė¶

Being in love with Myself, I knew I had to fill the hole in My heart….errr mind, errrr….mouth. So I did extensive research and chose a “dental implant”. It works like this: A titanium post (like a tooth root) is surgically positioned into the jawbone beneath the gum, allowing the dentist to mount a replacement tooth onto an abutment over the titanium post. Check it out:


I had a top-of-the-line crown mounted onto My titanium post. The whole thing took a long time, several procedures, (damn humans touching Me, drives Me to homicidal rage) and cost a lot of money, just about $3,000.00 usd in total, from extraction to completed crown mount. But of course I am worth it, because My worth is infinite.

A few brilliant thoughts: Titanium, baby! I love that the titanium post was implanted directly into my jawbone, and that it melded and fused to the bone. Artificial, strong, beautiful, and part of Me, now.

If you read My texts you know, I have rejected and transcended MY humanity, mentally. I only wish, with every fiber of mind consciousness, that I could also do so physically. And this is just a tiny and meaningless token gesture in that direction. But still, I like it. A little bit less human, physically, and a little bit better, stronger. This one tooth is now the omnipotent tooth, much stronger, as factual reality, than all the rest, and its artificiality is what makes it stronger.

Another point: It feels different than the other teeth. It feels different because it is different. It is anchored to My beautiful jaw via a titanium post. As a structure, it is different. Does it feel very different? No. The difference is subtle, you have to be Self-focused to always be consciously aware of the different feel. I like that the felt difference is small, and must be focused upon to realize, yet cannot be denied. An alien structure, integrated to and within Me.

If you read about this type of dental implant online, you will find that most dentists hawking the procedure, and general dental information websites, will tell you the implanted crown will feel exactly the same as all your other, “natural” teeth. That’s because humans¬†want the feeling to be the same. If you go to patient discussion boards, you find a mixed response. Some humans claim the implant feels exactly the same, while others admit and acknowledge the difference. Inferiors often fail to perceive what they do not¬†want to be True, what they do not want to accept.

Personally, of course, I love the feeling of difference. Artificial, different, unnatural, and better.

Which brings Me to the most important point of this essay, humans: It is time to wake up to the Forbidden Truth and stop worshipping nature and the natural! As I have made clear in previous texts, nature is not your friend. Nature is your mortal enemy! Nature is mindless, nature has no sentience.

Nature is unjust, nature is unfair, natural things are weak, mortal, they decay easily.

Open your mind and see: You do not owe anything to nature! The only hope for the Self is within the embrace of the artificial. Titanium and bone, living together in harmony, within Me, making Me stronger. And yes, you can say titanium is a “natural” substance, but it is not naturally within Me, is it?

We must abandon nature. Death is “natural”, but death is wrong. Only in rejecting the perverse notion that there is sacredness in nature or natural things, can we make the universe of Self right, achieve our limitless potential as eternally alive minds.

Stop worshipping your body, it is flawed and it is doomed to fail. Worship what is best for You, as a Self-universe of mind. I want to be made of titanium, all of Me, all the way to a titanium shield encircling every brain cell.

As Immortalists we must wage war against nature, and we must defeat nature! This must be our conscious mandate. We must fall easily into love, with the artificial. We must never be prejudiced in favor of what we were born possessing. Who needs a natural heart, if an artificial heart works better? Who needs eyes if bionic implants allow you to see things better?

This is how evolution must be defined: The capacity of mind, individually and collectively, to leap without hesitation into radical change, to leave behind and abandon everything within us that is weak, failing, easily compromised, in favor of whatever is strong vibrant, long-lasting, difficult to compromise.

The war cry of the Evolutionists must be: We will destroy first, whatever is trying to destroy us. Nature may have given us the gift of existence as a species, but we owe no debt, as nature also imposes retroactive unbirth upon every individual.

Let us use the artificial, to replace the natural, to save ourselves!

All Text is Copyright © 2014-2064 The Seer of Forbidden Truth. All Rights Reserved.

Evidentiary Proof of the Birth Defect Status of the Human Brain

The purpose of this essay is to articulate and disseminate all of the primary, evidentiary proof I have realized, that humanity as a species exists as a genetic and biological birth defect. Before I begin listing the evidence, there are two specific terms that must be clearly and properly defined and understood.

The first is “evidentiary proof”. There are¬†many very important Forbidden Truths that cannot be proven “concretely”, for many different reasons. Meaning, beyond all shadow of all doubt. But they can be proven via a preponderance of overwhelming evidence and various facts, all brought together to demonstrate factual Truth to all sane, rational, and fair-minded brains capable of deductive reasoning absent the external bias and prejudice demanded by The Hive Mind of Universal Illusion.

The birth defect status of humanity is such a Truth. Evidentiary proof, as brilliantly presented by Me in this essay, must be recognized as being just as valid as concrete proof.

The second term requiring definitional dissection is: Birth defect. What is a birth defect? It is a malformation and deformation of a specific part of the body of a specific species, that deviates from the norm of the originating species in a significant way, and is present within the affected life form at the moment of birth For the purpose of this essay, My use of the term “birth defect” references very specifically a hereditary/genetic cause, and all of My comments also focus exclusively on a single body part: The human brain.

So, let us begin. The human being exists today as a result of a natural process. This process is called evolution. Evolution is valid and real, it is a way of describing how life forms biologically change over time, in both appearance and lifestyle/behaviors. The evolutionary process must not be discredited, it is an important Truth, directly undermining Matrix deceptions such as the Insane God Myth.

99+% of the time, the evolutionary process is very slow, it takes many centuries for very small changes to a species, to occur. In a few rare instances, the evolutionary process is very rapid, such as a caterpillar transforming into a butterfly. Most humans refer to this as “metamorphosis”, rather than evolution, but it is clearly an evolutionary process.

Because the evolutionary process is generally very slow, any rapid or major change in the structure of a specific body part, suggests the possibility of a birth defect having occurred, instead of evolutionary change. Here we have the first glimpse of Forbidden Truth: The human brain is significantly different in design and functionality from that of any other simian. The closest versions belong to the chimpanzee and Rhesus monkey, and the similarities are close enough to prove humans did evolve, at least in part, from a simian. But, was this process one of natural evolution, or of a singular birth defect of the brain?

The significant differences in human brain functionality from all other simians, suggests a birth defect caused a singular simian to divert from the norm, and this singular simian reproduced, passing along his defectiveness to his offspring, who passed it along to their offspring, and on and on, resulting in the formation of a new, different species, which now calls itself the “human being”.

It is very interesting to hypothesize the exact physiology of the two initial mated creatures who created this birth defect. It could have been two chimpanzees, or a chimpanzee mating with another simian, or a chimpanzee mating with a completely different species. It could even be, hold on to your hats here, a simian mating with an extraterrestrial life form. Certainly this is not beyond the realm of possibility, although no concrete evidence exists to lend specific credence to the possibility.

Let’s analyze the radical differences that exist between humans and all other species.

The human being, alone among all other species, has experienced a singularly unique, unmatched and catastrophic, failure to thrive.

Only the human being chooses to end his own existence, via both dynamic and long-term suicide.

Only the human being chooses to suffer and to inflict pain/harm upon himself.

Only the human being hides from reality, pathologically creating and dwelling within fictional illusions of the real world.

Only the human being tries to solve minor problems, while ignoring and pretending that other, much more major and important problems, don’t exist.

Only the human is a pathological addict to substances that are actively harmful to him.

Only the human negates his own Self-value, leaving it to others to control how he feels about Himself.

Only the human consciously chooses to harm and destroy the environment upon which he is dependent for survival.

Only the human directs negative perception of Self, upon himself.

Only the human insists upon continuing to do what has failed over and over in the past.

Only the human chooses slavery over freedom.

These are all profound dysfunctions of behavior and thought, directly originating within the brain. And they are all unmatched by any other creature. Simians DO demonstrate very mild versions of a few of these pathologies, proving the legitimacy of evolution, but at the same time demonstrating the vast gulf between their much more functional brains, and validating the birth defect origins of the human brain.

Insanity is a disease of the brain only afflicting humans, and it must be understood as everything the human decrees to be normal. The “normal” state of mind of the human brain, is that of absolute insanity. Again, only a genetic birth defect can explain this.

Some will point out My past writings on the impact of universal child abuse and the fact every human is a tortured victim-creation of external trauma.

This is absolutely correct, and external trauma plays a huge and primary role in the universal failure of humanity to thrive. But it does so in conjunction with the birth defect status of the human brain. The reason humans remain hopelessly trapped within an endless cycle of perpetual victimization and trauma, can be traced back to universal child abuse, which itself can be traced back to the birth defect status of the human brain.

Every other animal learns from its own mistakes, figures out how to do things better, learns by observing the mistakes of fellow species members. But not the human.

Look at human history objectively and factually, and you see how things have gotten progressively worse. How many humans 10,000 years ago chose to commit dynamic suicide? How many humans 10,000 years ago chose to murder other animals purely for fun/sport? How many humans 10,000 years ago deliberately chose to destroy their own health?

Why are humans functioning on a more brain dysfunctional level today, than 10,000 years ago? Because all genetic birth defects are progressive in nature. They get worse over time, as they are passed down from generation to generation.

I challenge you to articulate even one primary-level human problem, that humanity has solved over the past 10,000 years. Just one, name it! Hunger? Pain? Poverty? Child abuse? Familial violence? Belief in mythologies and supernatural idols? Injustice? Death? Nothing has been solved, nothing! Everything wrong 10,000 years ago, is exactly the same today, only worse. Another beautiful evidentiary proof of the birth defect status of the human brain.

There are three primary levels of brain functionality: Instinct, emotion, and intellect. These three are separate and distinct from each other. Within the human brain, only the human brain, instinct is severely compromised. Natural instinct, for survival, well-being, for freedom, for autonomy.

Natural instinct is neutered within the human. At the same time, emotionalism is hyper-stimulated, ensuring irrational, impulsive, stupid decisions. Which brings us to intellect. Humans claim to be the smartest of all animals, by far. But they are not. They are infinitely stupid. They can’t even figure out what a problem is, much less even¬†try to solve it!

All three primary levels of human brain function, instinct, emotion, and intellect, are absolutely crippled, on a species-wide scale. This is unprecedented among any species. It can only occur due to genetic, biological defectiveness of the brain itself.

The human brain, in all of its intellectual glory, can perceive certain realities, such as death, that many other species apparently cannot consciously perceive. But it cannot deal with these reality perceptions, it cannot cope with them. That is not normal.

A genetically healthy brain either perceives and deals with specific realities, or does not perceive, and therefore has no need to deal with, specific realities. But to perceive, but not be able to deal, is a dysfunction of brain design, a genetic defect.

Within this essay I have demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt, that the human brain is genetically and biologically defective. The hopelessness of the human situation is proven by the inability and refusal of humanity to consciously acknowledge this fact, so that it can try to take proactive steps to mitigate the impacts of this horrific medical problem, a problem for which humanity as a species is not to blame. Possessing a genetically defective brain was not a personal or a collective human choice, but every human alive today IS to blame, for refusing to face up to this Forbidden Truth.

There are numerous potential methods of mitigation, but that will have to wait for a future, brilliant Mind Bomb essay. For now, enjoy this boom!

mind 71All Text is Copyright © 2014-2064 The Seer of Forbidden Truth. All Rights Reserved.


Self-awareness and the Mutant Monkey Problem

In this recent essay, among many others, I articulate the Forbidden Truth that humanity came into existence as a birth defect species, a horribly flawed mutation of the monkey, which is itself one of the most genetically unhealthy of all species, on a brain functionality level:


So let Me now expand upon the Mutant Monkey problem, because how can the mutant monkey, which is you, each and every one of you, ever begin to try to overcome its genetic crippling, if it lacks the Self-awareness, the Self-insight, the conscious introspection, to realize and to know what it is, and why it is what it is, within the light of Truth??

No external Truths can ever be properly and fully recognized, analyzed, or integrated to personal consciousness, unless and until all foundational level internal, directly personal Truths, are first recognized, analyzed, and integrated to personal consciousness. This is the order that must be followed, by any human claiming to value and seek Truth.

A foundational level internal Truth, is that you, and everyone born human, are mentally defective on a genetic level. You ARE a birth defect. Your brain does not function properly, your brain is genetically defective. Therefore nothing it instructs you to think, to feel, to imagine, to perceive, can ever be trusted, can ever be taken at face value. This Forbidden Truth is profoundly important.

No external reality perceptions or factual, functional Truths can ever be properly analyzed and deciphered, unless they are directly, overtly, consciously filtered through & immersed within the internal reality of what you are: A mentally crippled, diseased, deformed monkey. This is consciousness, this is Self-awareness, this is the achievement of introspection, instead of the universal delusion of it.

What are you? Are you a pacifist? A vegetarian? A parent? A teacher? A student? A philosopher? A good person? A lover? A hater?

Every perception of Self is warped and invalid, formed within utter illusion and the blindness of knowing NOTHING, unless it is initially and continuously conceived of and built upon, the fully conscious knowledge and understanding that you are a mentally crippled monkey.

Only upon this foundational Truth, is it possible to begin to try to unlock any external Truths: You ARE THAT. If you achieve full consciousness and acceptance of this Truth, you can start asking Yourself: Why do I perceive Myself as being a parent? Why do I need to seek love from others? Why do I want to suffer and die? Why do I create monuments out of lies and delusions? And thousands of other profound questions directly related to reality perception and to gain an understanding of WHY humanity has built itself an insane asylum and chooses to dwell caged, within it.


All Text is Copyright © 2014-2064 The Seer of Forbidden Truth. All Rights Reserved.

Technological Immortality in Historical Context

Those of you who read My writings should know that I am an Immortalist. I seize and demand an inalienable personal right to be born, to live, and to exist. The only way any sentient creature can be born, can live, can exist, is to affirmatively attain immortality, and the only viable method by which personal immortality can be achieved, is via the use of science and technology.

You can read some of My brilliant insights of Forbidden Truth on the issue of immortality, by following this link:


I recently received an interesting comment to one of My posts on this issue. The comment reads:

“What would a superior view of humanity and death be in, say, the 1700s, or even further back to civilisations like Ancient Rome or ancient Egypt?

In these periods, the very concept, let alone actualisation of technological immortality would have been literally unimaginable.

The truth that we are all being murdered by the deliberate refusal of immortality in 2015, while profound and forbidden, is still a very new truth. For 99.9% of human history, this truth did not yet exist as functional reality

So my question is what would be the appropriate view of death take for a superior living in Egypt 3000 years ago? Would death still be seen as a tragic inevitability, with the only difference being that the blame isn’t placed on humans themselves?

This isn‚Äôt an argument or criticism either, it‚Äôs literally a sincere curiosity I have. Ever since I discovered forbidden truth I have been fascinated and curious about how Superiors and Superiority would manifest itself in different times, vultures and civilizational models.”

This comment, and the questions it raises, are not merely thought-provoking, but allow for a genuine expansion of our understanding of the human condition, as well as the failure of humanity to attain technological immortality, from a historical perespective. This essay will be quite lengthy, because there are many diverse points and issues which must be explored within the Forbidden Truth envelope, in order to fully and comprehensively address and resolve this topic.

I want to begin by explaining how history must be defined. History cannot be seen or judged as an exploration of how things were in the past. Such an analysis is certain to be both limited and flawed, failing to illuminate Forbidden Truth. All historical analysis must resolve the issue of how things were not in the past, to the same degree as resolving how things were in the past. Only within such a full-spectrum analysis, is factual reality and Truth illuminated.

History is not shaped or altered by specific individuals. It never has been, and it is not today. History is directed by the collective will and desire of entire species, be they acting in a collaborative effort, or in isoolated individualism. Meaning, the evolutionary, or devolutionary path of a species can only be altered by the superior mind of an individual, be it a scientist, philosopher, teacher, etc…, if both the collective mainstream will and the existing societal level of reality perception, matches and dovetails with the proposed changes being suggested, or demanded, by an individual, Superior mind.

It is very important to understand the above Forbidden Truth, and the impact it has always had upon the historical choices and paths, along with positive progress and the lack thereof, of the human species. Individuals do not change the course of history. It is wrong to perceive or to conclude that whoever figured out how to make and control fire, at least 400,000 years ago, as an example, altered the course of human history.

Consider: It is clear that multiple individuals, spread over a diverse area, who had no contact with each other, figured out how to make fires. The making of fire was “discovered”, only because it was embraced and accepted by the species as a whole. The species wanted fires to be made, and so fires were made. And¬†then hundreds of ¬†thousands of years passed by, with effectively no scientific progression from this discovery. Hundreds of thousands of years!! Why? Because humanity as a species was satisfied with being able to make fire, it did not want to progress further. History expresses what a species wants, not what it is capable of achieving.

So now let us begin to tackle the issue of death, from a historical context. Death has always been a problem which must be solved. A bad thing, an unacceptable end result, for which a solution must be realized, embraced, and made manifest reality. The human solution to freezing to death in cold weather, and being unable to see in the darkness of night, and being unable to cook food, and being unable to ward off predators, was the scientific embrace of the creation of fire. Make no mistake, creating fire was an act of science, even if no human creature could define such a term at that point in time. A solution to these problems was needed, was sought, was realized, was implemented, not as a singular discovery, but by numerous minds in conscious understanding that there was a problem, and it needed to be solved, and a solution was sought, accepted, utilized.

But what about the problem of death??? Death was not recognized by the human being as a problem that must be solved. It was not recognized as a problem, period. Death was accepted as “natural”, or inevitable, or a good thing or nothing to worry about. It was accepted 400,000 years ago, and 50,000 years ago, and 1,000 years ago, and 200 years ago, and it is accepted today, July 14, 2015. Literally, nothing has changed over the course of 400,000 years!! 400,000 years ago, humans¬†chose and tried¬†to delay and postpone death, and today humans use surgery, medicine, an artificial heart, vitamins, etc…, to delay and postpone death. It is exactly the same thing! Death itself is not recognized as a problem which must be solved, anymore today than it was 400,000 years ago.

So, when my commentator goes back only to the 1700’s, or ancient rome, and questions what a superior perspective and understanding of death would have been back then, he fails to place the human understanding of death in historical context, a context which must go back hunderds of thousands of years, because death has always been the #1 problem facing not merely humanity, not merely every human being, but every single sentient organism on an individual level, including the ant and cockroach.

No problem can be solved unless it is recognized as a problem. Humanity has proven, dating back hunderds of thousands of years, that it can, will, and does solve the problems that it recognizes as problems, and that it wants to solve. Science and tchnology is absolutely evolutionary and progressive in nature. Absolutely! Nobody is arguing that technological immortality could have been achieved prior to the scientific discovery of how to create fire, 400,000 years ago. But the Superior thinker understands that humanity as a species has embraced death, chosen to die, and continues to do so, effectively renouncing and rejecting the achievement of technological immortality.

How would history have evolved, if 400,000 years ago, humanity as a collective species resolved to find a solution to the problem of death, as it did resolve to find a solution to the problem of freezing temperatures and the darkness of a moonless night, and the need to scare off lions and bears??

And so we come to the human brain, fatally flawed on a genetic level, 400,000 years ago, 1,000 years ago, and today. Yes, the human brain has “evolved” over 400,000 years, in terms of knowledge, in terms of fact accumulation, but in terms of cognitive capacity to recognize and embrace Truth?? No! It has not evolved! 400,000 years ago, the human could witness death, he could see a rotting human corpse being consumed by maggots, he could see a human skeleton, absolute bone, immovable, lifeless, no brain, no heart. A formerly sentient life form, reduced to eternal nothingness, retroactive unbirth. He could see this with absolute clarity, just as is the case today. But he did not see reality and Truth, just as today, nobody sees this reality and Truth.

Nothing can be achieved unless and until it is imagined. And nothing can be imagined unless it is desired. The genetically crippled human brain has always accepted death, rationalized death as the right thing to experience. The reasons why this is so, are complex and multi-faceted, worthy of a completely new essay. We have cowardice at the forefront, combining with Self-hatred, an addiction of comforting fantasies, an inability to accept Truth and reality, emotional malfunctions, including addiction to other living things. We have the “monkey see, monkey do” pathology of mind, mindless following, “He died, so I gotta die too”.

It is clear, to the logical and sane thinker, that the intelligence potential, meaning the intellectual capacity of the human brain, was not and  is not the primary problem, insofar as making technological immortality a functional reality. The primary problem has always been desire, reality perception, and the inability of the human being to consciously accept the factual realities of what death is, and by proxy, to find the courage to undertake a battle to defeat death. Understand: To undertake such a battle requires the conscious understanding of what will be lost, what you, the individual will lose, should you fail to win the battle. The consequence of loss, is eternal nothingness and retroactive unbirth. Humanity cannot face and accept this Truth, therefore cannot choose to undertake the battle. A battle not undertaken, can never be won.

This is the historical context within which technological immortality must be understood. Every generation of human beings, at every singular point in time dating back hundreds of thousands of years, has lacked the brain-based courage to embrace the factual consequences of death, on a directly personal level. If the human of 400,000 years ago, or 50,000 years ago, or 1,000 years ago, had desired, demanded, and fought to achieve technological immortality, it would be a reality today.

How long would it have taken?? Exactly when would technological immortality have been achieved?? These are impossible questions to accurately answer, but they are also irrelevant, unimportant questions. The profoundly important Truth is that the entire historical timeline would have been radically altered, and none of us would be dying today, unless of course the altered historical timeline would have had other negative consequences, such as humanity having extincted itself by its own hand by now…

All that has ever been required to achieve technological immortality has been courage and Truth, on a personal and a species-wide level. The courage to undertake a war against a True enemy, death, knowing and understanding that if you lose, the consequences for you on a personal level, will be horrific. And the capacity to embrace the Truth, that not undertaking the war will definately result in suffering the same horrific consequences, therefore logic dictates you must choose to undertake the war. Simple logic, but the genetically and environmentally diseased and broken human brain, cannot accept it.

If the individual human of 400,000 years ago had found the courage to embrace these Truths and undertake this war, he himself would most likely have lost, and suffered the horror of death. So would many future generations. It would likely have taken at least thousands, more likely tens of thousands of years, of unrelenting effort, for the human being of 400,000 years ago, to progress from making fire with sticks, to achieving technological immortality.

But he would have succeeded. Scientific progress is nothing more than an ongoing accumulation of knowledge, fact, technology, and Truth, appropriately applied. Starting with very little, it would have taken the human of 400,000 years ago, a significant amount of time. But by not seeking technological immortality, the human species absolutely wasted hundreds of thousands of years, dooming trillions of humans to the horror of death, by its own pathetic, perverse, cowardly choice.

Today, in 2015, the situation is radically different, but only by pure luck, only by the fact that over so many years, the scientific and technological knowledge base of humanity has greatly expanded and deepened, not due to any genuine embrace of science in any positive way at any point in time, but simply due to the passage of time and the need for humans to maintain the Self-delusion that they are progressing on an evolutionary level.

Science is just as rejected today as it was 400,000 years ago, when the species decided that making fire with sticks was good enough. Today, curing cancer so a human can pretend to be alive for 10 more years, is good enough, according to humanity. Nothing has changed! The only thing different is that the species has greatly accelerated its devolutionary spiral, with suicidal ideation greatly increased, insane obsessions with external love, with false illusions of power, with enslaving others and imagining you are not enslaved, and many other pathologies of brain function reaching new heights of severity.

But back to my primary point, and the irony here is immense! Despite the human devolutionary spiral, despite the fact that humanity has wasted 400,000 years of time by failing to embrace Truth, thereby failing to alter the historical timeline and making technological immortality a functional reality many thousands of years ago, in terms of science and technology, humanity still has never been closer than right now, to achieving this feat!

The rational mind of a sane human of 400,000 years ago, would have pretty much been forced to resign itself to the fact that on a personal level, he will lose the war to attain technological immortality, even though obviously he must fight it, because the consequences of not fighting would be just as horrific. Still, you can say this upcoming personal loss could be an excuse, not a valid excuse, but still an excuse, not to fight.

But on July 14, 2015, this excuse is null and void. Because with the preface that there is no guarantee, if humanity as a species resolved today, on this very date, to undertake an all-out war, to band together as a species and deploy every available resource and effort to achieve technological immortality, it is clear that the achievement would occur rapidly, very rapidly, within 10 years I would estimate. 20 years at most! So this means that the majority of us who are alive at this moment, would achieve personal immortality!

This is a huge difference in comparison to the human being of 400,000 years ago, and given the altered historical timeline, the human being of the roman empire era, or of 1700, 1800, even 1900. Logic dictates that the conscious realization that we can today, literally and actually make ourselves immortal, should be able to inspire a worldwide, one-voice movement to eradicate death. But no, of course not! Because we have the devolutionary spiral in play, the fact that humanity as a species is much more mentally diseased and dysfunctional today, than it was 400,000, 50,000, or even 1,000 years ago.

Death has been woven into the very fabric, the very consciousness, of all of humanity. And now, in the 21st century, the capacity to achieve technological immortality on a personal level, never actually sought or desired by humanity at any point in time, truly a gift from nature, the greatest of all possible gifts, cannot be embraced, cannot be understood, cannot be contemplated or fathomed, much less affirmatively seized and turned into functional reality.

This is the greatest of all ironies, and the greatest of all horrors, to all who are sane, to all who love themselves and are Superiors of mind, such as Myself. I am a murder victim! I am a murder victim of humanity as a collective entity, dating back hundreds of thousands of years. And I am your murder victim, today, yesterday, tomorrow. I am your murder victim, murder victim of every human being alive at this moment in time, who fails to recognize his capacity to make technological immortality a reality, and who allows his species to continue to cause each of us to be murdered.

All text is Copyright © 2014-2064 The Seer of Forbidden Truth. All Rights Reserved.

The Human: Doomed, Genetic Birth Defect

The human being exists as an unnatural mutation, a genetic birth defect. The purpose of this blog post is to lay out the¬†incontrovertible behavioral and functional evidence which establishes this Forbidden Truth. But first, to be perfectly clear, it must be understood that there is nothing supernatural, mystical, or extraterrestrial involved in this factual reality. No valid law of nature is being violated. Human beings are a “naturally” evolved species, in terms of biological procreation. Human beings exist as a natural biological mutation, a consequence of existing creatures here on earth having had sexual intercourse and creating new life as a result.

So, with this vital preliminary Truth established, let us move forward. What is a birth defect?? On an individual level, birth defect may be accurately defined as something being born which lacks a significant attribute possessed by most other members of its species, which negatively impacts its capacity to thrive independently. For example, an animal born without any legs, can be legitimately classified as a birth defect, because most animals are born with legs, and legs are extremely helpful to an animal in terms of its own physical survival.

Society would classify a human woman born with three fully functional eyes, one in the center of her forehead, as suffering from a birth defect. This definition would be invalid, because the physical functionality of three eyes is superior to that of two eyes. In such a case, the term “birth defect” would be deployed to demonize and negatively judge based upon physical appearance. It is important to Truthfully define the term “birth defect”, on an individual level, as only being applicable in cases where the physical or mental functionality of an individual is negatively impacted by a biological anomaly. If humanity were sane, any physical or mental abnormality which positively impacts personal functionality, would be labeled a “birth asset”, instead of a birth defect, but ironically, this concept is beyond the capacity of most inferiors to understand, due to their birth defect status as a species.

Can an entire species, as opposed to specifically rare members of a species, exist as a genetic birth defect? The answer is clearly Yes, and this can only occur in one very specific way. It can occur when a singular creature born with a legitimate birth defect that can be genetically transmitted, survives long enough to breed, passing its birth defect onto its offspring, and this offspring also breeds, continuing to pass along the genetic birth defect. In this way, an entire species, millions, billions, trillions of individual creatures can come to eventually exist, all suffering from the same genetic birth defect, all existing as genetic birth defects.

Does this occur often?? The answer is no. Remember, an individual birth defect is a negative feature which can be expected to carry negative consequences for the afflicted individual life form, making it very difficult for him (or her) to even survive for any length of time after being born, much less to successfully breed, and even if the individual birth defect successfully breeds, this is still a far cry from an entirely new species of life successfully multiplying over many centuries, as would be required for a species to go from a single member to a million or a billion members.

The human being has defied these odds, to exist as a birth defect species. Simians exhibit some of the same behavioral and ideological pathologies as the human, but to a much milder degree. It is clear that the human is a genetic offshoot of the simian, but not a naturally evolved product. What happened was, a simian gave birth to a birth defect, a creature with a defective brain. But despite suffering from a defective brain, this creature was able to survive and to breed, passing along his genetic mutation, his gene failure, to other living things. The defective brain of the new human species did possess a few attributes which aided it in surviving and breeding, even as its defective status rendered it unfit and unsuitable to continue to exist, much less to exert dominance and control over the lives and existences of other species.

But of course the newly minted human defectives could not even begin to imagine, much less consciously analyze and embrace, the Truth of their own status of being a birth defect species. No, they existed as slaves to their defective brains, fighting for personal survival as best they could, oblivious to philosophical. ideological, moral, or ethical dilemmas.

To keep things simple, in the beginning, the human was merely an inferior, murderous, monkey. A parasitical new species which caused immediate problems, upsetting the natural balance because it simply should not have been there. But go forward thousands of years, study how humanity has evolved, and you the horrifically negative impacts of the human upon all other species, exponentially increasing. This is because all genetic birth defects worsen and become more severe, over time. The brain of every¬†human is far more defective right now, than was the brain of the very first simian bred genetic birth defect, who may now be successfully idenfied as the “father of the human species”.

A genetically defective species does not evolve, it devolves. It becomes more pathologically broken over time, as its genetic fault lines deepen. You can see this in humanity, by analyzing, without prejudice or hypocritical rationalization, how humans lived 50,000 years ago, versus 10,000 years ago, versus 1000 years ago, versus 500 years ago, versus today. The decrease in functional viability is undeniable, as is the increase in insane choices and decisions, impossible to justify given the state of factual knowledge and scientific discovery. This is how devolution, the opposite of evolution, must be Truthfully assessed and identified.

An interesting question to ponder is this: Are there any other genetic birth defect species of life, beyond the human, currently existing here on earth?  I cannot give you a definitive, 100% certain answer. But I can assess, with certainty, that no other species of life comes anywhere close to matching the degree of defectiveness of the human, or the horrifically negative impact the birth defect human has exerted upon every natural structure and resource, sentient and not, alive or merely atmospheric, throughout this entire planet and extending to the solar system.

Now it is time for graphic and real-life examples, proof if you will, of the unique birth defect status of humanity as a species:

  • No other species of life consciously chooses to destroy all positive potential of all of its offspring, to positively evolve and progress to Self-benefit. Humans do.
  • No other species of life chooses to pathologically cause physical harm to itself, destroying its own health and shortening its own lifespan. Humans do.
  • No other species of life chooses to die, even after it becomes consciously aware that death can be overcome. Humans do.
  • No other species of life is actively suicidal. Humans are.
  • No other species of life chooses to collectively engage in behaviors which cause genocidal harm to members of their own species, for the sole purpose of gaining emotional catharsis. Humans do.
  • No other species chooses to massacre other species of life for emotional catharsis, not to satisfy any specific need to satisfy hunger. Humans do.
  • No other species of life chooses to live by an established morality code which defies both Truth and Self-interest/benefit. Humans do
  • No other species of life concocts imaginary fables and myths for the purpose of emotional comfort, which only serve to ensure the continuation of all existing suffering and harm. Humans do.
  • No other species of life ritualizes death as a form of punishment and reward.
  • No other species of life chooses to enslave itself to artificial constructs that have no intrinsic value, such as money.
  • No other species of life chooses the imprisonment of the mind cage, not wanting to know what is true and real. Humans do.

I could list 100 more proofs, but that is no necessary. Any sane thinker who rejects the bias of his matrix, can see that humanity as a species stands apart from all other species. This division has numerous and severe environmental components, insanity passed down to every child by every existing adult generation. But as organic root, the genetic failure is undeniable. The human being is genetically defective, a birth defect, and every ongoing, real-time environmental pathogen it creates and imposes upon itself, reflects the hopelessness of its originating failure.

And what use is this realization of Forbidden Truth? Functionally, none. The human is currently in the death throes of its devolutionary spiral. Impact has already been achieved, aborting the collision course is no longer possible. Only in theory, can the conscious realization that you are a birth defect species, inspire you to a revolution of mind that allows you to consciously work towards overcoming the consequences of this genetic failure. That is a dream, that is what the blind optimist might conclude. Superiors know the Truth: My realization and embrace of this Forbidden Truth is a singular experience, which the Unwashed Masses are incapable of. It is their very status of being birth defects, which renders the conscious realization that they are birth defects, impossible.

And so it goes, Truth remains dead, as the deranged, epic, artificially constructed argument of whether the human was created by god or evolved from monkeys, continues. Are you a creationist? Or do you “believe” in the “theory” of evolution? That is how the deranged question is formulated. You are free to believe in the theory of evolution, even as you remain hopelessly chained by the inability to even consciously envision the Truth: That you are a genetic birth defect, and everything you have ever done, everything you have imagined or created, is nothing more than a clinical symptom of your genetic disease.

© Copyright 2014-2064 The Seer of Forbidden Truth. All Rights Reserved.

On Nature, Meat, Cannibalism, and the Eating of Food

This is a brilliantly insightful update  to My essay titled Food and the Politics of Institutionalized Genocide, which I posted to the blog approximately one week ago. I strongly suggest that you read that blog post first, because all knowledge is evolutionary in nature, building upon itself, and only inferiors leap into the middle of any structure without first dissecting its originating tentacles:


Also, for clarity, it is important that readers be aware that this post is being made in reply to a private email. All text from the emailer will be in italics, beginning with the words “begin quote”, and ending with the words “end quote”, while My reply is in regular lettering. I welcome email replies to My essays, and if they meet My quality control standards, reserve the right to reply to them either privately by email, or publicly via this blog. Public replies absolutely will respect the anonymity of the emailer. However, if you do not desire your words to appear anonymously in this public forum, you should not email Me at all.

Okay, our thoughtful reader says: Begin quote: “On nature and using nature as a moral benchmark: one thing I have noticed from your writings is that nature is described as a moral benchmark of sorts, which I do not find accurate. Nature is abstract, with no mind, no cognition. If nature was moral, humans would not be here. But nature only favors whatever reproduces the most, kills the most, steals the most. We must detach ourselves from the idea that we should do whatever is “natural” because there are many instincts, even in non-human creatures, that are completely and utterly insane and lack all logic.” End quote.

Your interpretation of My writings is not accurate. I will clarify: Nature deserves absolute respect and recognition as a valid structure, only when directly contrasted to that which is unnatural, or supernatural. Nature is real, an evolving structure imposing itself upon the universe, albeit lacking all sentience. There is nothing inherently “good” via the functionality of nature, but it is “good”, and vitally important, for seekers of Truth to embrace the validity of nature as a functioning structure. Nature lacks all morality, it does not deserve any respect for what it does, but it does deserve open acknowledgment as something real, which must be dealt with as a valid force, even as many of its unjust consequences must be rejected and overcome.

If you read My brilliant writings with an open mind, you see that many of My comments are directly opposed to what humans call “natural” law. Things such as death, motherhood, subservience to your brain rather than proactive ownership of your brain, can be said to directly defy natural law, and I accept this definition because I reject the authority of nature to impose its will upon Me. It has no such right. It is a structurally legitimate force, but this does not render the impacts this force has upon any of us, legitimate.

Nature is in every measurable way, our enemy, and must be consciously acknowledged and understood as such. But our battle against nature must always be rooted within Truth. We must never embrace unnatural or supernatural ideas or structures, while engaging in this battle. I vehemently support, and absolutely demand, things such as the eradication of death via technology, in open defiance of nature and its supposed “laws”, as invalidly judged by the inferior human masses. Death is not a natural law, it is a currently valid consequence of the natural process of physical aging, which we must defy and overcome.

Are there any natural “laws”, which must be blindly accepted and never challenged? Only one: Nature is real, it exists and it blindly imposes itself upon us. Everything it does to us must be openly and consciously challenged, within the realization of infinite, sacred right to Self-determination.

The Superior demands and personally achieves the triumphs of intellect over emotion, Self-determination via strength and force of mind, over any organized process of nature, such as death, and “instinct”, which in Truth directly undermines intellect and reason, and the organic right of technology to be used to overcome the injustices and flaws which nature is guilty of. But the validity of nature itself cannot be subverted and subordinated to lies or to deceit. The supernatural, in other words no imaginary illusion, can be allowed to exist on any equal or advanced level, to the natural. This is the law of nature, the only law of nature, that I exalt.

Our thoughtful Truth-seeker moves on to her next point: Begin quote: “On humans being result of unnatural mutation: there is nothing to suggest that humans evolved in a manner any less natural than other animals, thus the human is a “natural” creature. But being natural does not mean “moral” or “sane”, it simply means that it is the result of natural phenomenon. Mutations are never “unnatural” as they are the driving force behind a very natural process: evolution.” End quote.

Here a very vital and great Truth is being missed and rejected. Evolution is real, undeniable, and natural, but this has nothing to do with the human being existing as an unnatural birth defect, a genetically deformed mutation which must be understood as lacking the natural properties of other creatures. Immediately after this post, I will write out another post contrasting and detailing the profound differences, the profound failures, of the human being in direct comparison to all other animals. But it must be emphasized right here, that you are totally incorrect in your conclusion.

Life is naturally created via an evolutionary process which follows certain parameters. All other creatures exist within these parameters, even the caterpillar as he evolves to a butterfly. Only the human being defies these parameters, and the reason is because the human is a birth defect species, instead of a species which occasionally creates defective members, as is the case with all other animals. It is possible that a few other species originated as birth defects, but their functional symptoms are far less obvious and far less severe than that of the human. I cannot speak to this possibility with certainty, but I can be very certain, from the proof provided by the human evolutionary path dating back many thousands of years, that this specific species did not come into existence via the natural laws of evolution.

The proof that humans are genetically crippled and mutated, a species that should not have survived, much less come to rule over and impose upon other species of life, is in the ideological and behavioral choices made, and these choices express insanity, malformation of the brain and its function, on a level that no other animal comes close to matching. What humanity has done is transform the universe it inhabits into a horror show, by force and will of its own mind. This has nothing to do with survival, or killing for sustenance, or the natural instinct to breed and propagate. Humanity is genetically warped, an organic birth defect, primarily involving its brain and how it functions.

Of course humans came to exist because two creatures had sexual intercourse. But this does not render the human on a natural par with all other species. The original human was birthed as a radical departure from the two creatures who birthed him. He was different in a genetically deformed manner. He was different to the point where he should not have been able to find a mate, should not have been able to successfully reproduce. But nature is not perfect. Genetic birth defects sometimes survive and reproduce and they can result in an entirely new species being created. This is the human being, and this Forbidden Truth must be fully understood and integrated to conscious awareness. Humans do not make mistakes, humans are a mistake. Individual humans cannot be judged defective, because there is no sane standard by which to judge, as the species is itself foundationally, organically, defective.

Our Truth-seeking reader continues: Begin quote: “On cannibalism: you are absolutely right. I drove by a graveyard the other day and chuckled to myself, “These idiots”, I thought, “this land could go to some animals and plants; that meat could go to some starving humans, what a waste.” There is absolutely nothing wrong with the eating of newly dead body, and it would prevent the deaths of millions of creatures. Animals wouldn’t have to be slaughtered, and humans wouldn’t have to starve. But no, human insanity will not cease, not even for a minute.” End quote.

Yes, I am absolutely correct, and here you see the genetic inferiority of the human, shining through. Humans use their brain incorrectly. Humans cannot process ideas and experiences in a manner which reflects logic, order, sanity, or natural instinct. One human in a million appreciates the validity of cannibalism, that it should be occuring all the time. All humans who choose to eat meat should choose to consume human flesh, should recognize this meat as the most obvious and logical and appropriate choice, even more so because of the fact that they possess brains capable of rational, “higher” thought. But no, instead, it is one in a million, the tiny handful who have overcome their genetic brain deformity status.

To support and engage in cannibalism, as an eater of meat, is the most natural of choices, it should not even be open to controversy, if the human brain functioned normally. But instead it is absolutely taboo, must never even be considered, evokes horror and immediate condemnation to the very suggestion. This is because the human is genetically diseased and broken. He cannot see or accept himself as he is, much less understand the world which surrounds him.

The same organic derangement of mind, supplemented by relentless social brainwashing and indoctrination, which causes cannibalism to be demonized and rejected, is what causes Mandatory Parental Competency Testing, the elimination of punishment, the dissolution of religion and of government, and all other sane and logical reforms, to be judged insane and absurd and impossible and horrific. Every positive step forward is perceived as a horrific step backward, because the human functions within a devolutionary, regressive state of mind, the result of his organic birth defect status.

More thought-provoking comments from My reader: Begin quote: “On meat not being a main source of nutrition for humans: other primates have what’s called a cecum, which helps the animal break down cellulose (stores energy in plants) in vegetables. Humans do not have a functional cecum, which is why vegetables only yield little energy in the form of calories– we cannot break down cellulose. We can, however, break down glycogen (stores energy in animals) found in meat. Vegetable consumption should be higher in humans than meat consumption, but meat is still a necessary source of energy and amino acids (which create proteins in our body).”

The eating of food is a human weakness which should be overcome and eliminated. It is part of the overall spectrum of body dependency which modern era governments and societies are intent upon preserving and maintaining. As long as humans continue to obsess over eating food, they can never begin to focus upon the Forbidden Truth that they exist as brain, that all existence must be understood as brain-based.

Whatever difficulty humans may have in digesting plant proteins due to lack of a functional cecum, does not prevent humans who reject all meat from becoming and staying physically strong and healthy. Many high performance athletes reject all meat. The ability of humans to develop extremely large muscles while not eating any meat, is indicated by web sites such as this:


But I am not an advocate of vegetarianism. I am an advocate of eliminating the universal slavery of dependence upon food to live and to thrive, which is itself subordinate to My advocacy of the elimination of all body dependency, and the exaltation of the individual brain as the supreme and only definition of personal existence.

The barbarism of the human is proven by his refusal to eat human meat, or even to wait until animals die of old age or of natural causes before consuming them. Humans kill and eat animals to satiate homicidal rage and soothe other brain-based dysfunctions of mind causd by the suffering of personal trauma. The refusal of the human to embrace scientific research and progress towards eliminating food dependency, speaks to his pathology of mind.

Still more interesting thoughts from My reader: “On the use of weaponry and tools to hunt being “unnatural”: humans lack strength, all they have is stamina and the ability to make tools. Our “natural” hunting strategy was to chase down an animal until it got tired and kill it with a tool we created (ancestors used to use spears). All animals have the right to use whatever mental/physical faculties available to them to survive (humans are not the only creatures that use tools to survive) and humans need to use their tools to survive.”

Humans lack physical strength, a genetic weakness. But nature provided the human with the potential for brain-based intellegence, a genetic strength. But genetic weakness and genetic strength are both subordinate to genetic dysfunction, the birth defect status of the human being as a species. The instinct to personally survive is naturally strong, even in the defective human. Figuring out how to kill larger and stronger animals in order to survive, as the caveman and neanderthal did, is not something to judge or condemn now, in hindsight.

What should be understood and consciously dissected, is the fact that our “ancestors” earned and received extinction. The neanderthal is extinct, a failed species. The human of today is doomed to extinction, another failed species, because he cannot positively evolve. Humans do not need meat to survive, and as of today, they do not need food to survive. They need nutrients, which can be obtained in numerous ways. Yet they choose to eat meat and food, and to pathologically reject the elimination of food dependency, which would be a valuable, foundational step towards achieving technological immortality.

So what you have is the human of today using the intellectualized excuse that he needs to survive, to justify mass murder and genocide of animals, trees, and plants, but in Truth he is assuring his own death by choosing to perceive himself as a body instead of a mind, and by pathologically clinging to unnecessary dependency upon his own physical body.

My female reader, she chose to mention this distinction, continues: Begin quote: “Cognition as it relates to animals and plants: you have mentioned that since a plant does not have a brain, the murder of the creature is less of an injustice. I disagree, because if one were to apply that same logic to fetuses, you consequently show abortion to be less of an injustice than the murder of a fully grown adult being. The fetus has no brain, thus it is not self aware, and cannot be aware of its own existence and the consequences that arise from loss of said existence. Therefore, the killing of a fetus while it has no brain is now more ethical than the killing of an adult human, which We all know to be false, given the insanity displayed by the adult human and the relative purity of the fetus. I think that to avoid this logical inconsistency, the murder of plants and animals must be considered ethical equals, as they both result in the same injustice. However, since the killing of plants is more inescapable and more necessary to the sustenance of personal life than the killing of animals, the killing of plants will be seen as more morally justified.” End quote.

The murder of a plant is less of an injustice than the murder of an animal, because of the capacity of the animal to consciously perceive its own existence. Injustice and suffering must be understood as personal experiences, above and beyond a detached, external judgment of morality, ethics, or entitlement. This distinction is valid, but it does not render the intentional physical destruction of a tree or plant by a human, any less murderous than such destruction of an animal.

The term “murder” is equally appropriate, and carries the same weight, just as must be the case with every act of human murder, rendering all labels such as “abortion” or “death penalty” or euthanasia”, utterly invalid and constituting deliberate attempt to reject the reality and Truth of the atrocity being carried out. Your claim that the murder of a human fetus is being rendered comparable to the murder of a plant, by My expressed logic, is invalid. A six week old fetus is already functioning as a brain as demonstrated by neuron firing. Therefore a six week old fetus already possesses a brain, that no plant or tree can or will possess. But even more primarily, every fetus-trapped human being will develop a brain just as complex and potentially brilliant as mine, unless it ceases to exist, and abortion is the act of murder which causes the fetus-trapped human being to cease to exist. Therefore every act of abortion constitutes the proactive murder of a human brain, even if the brain itself has not fully formed, or has not even formed at all, which only applies to fetuses under 6 weeks of age.

More thoughts not from My brilliant mind: Begin quote: “On food as source of comfort and catharsis: one can only expect such insanity from a species that declares “happiness” as the highest good. People will do anything– anything– to feel comfortable. They are even willing to murder other species, species whose livelihoods are already being threatened by humanity, to keep that sadistic smile on their faces. And like you said, the act of murder in and of itself isn’t the problem, it’s the fact that they do sadistic things and still claim some sort of moral high ground.”

Correct, and well-stated. Comfort of mind is the subconscious obsession of all inferior humans. And comfort of mind must involve the hypocritical rejection of Truth, because within the realm of conscious embrace of Forbidden Truth, comfort of mind cannot be created, established, or maintained, it is simply not possible. The human exists as pathological addict to whatever comforts him, whatever allows him to reject, deny, and escape from the reality of the horrors of his own existence, as it plays out in real-time.

An extremely important point to note, is how comfort of mind always comes at a great cost. It comes at the cost of suffering physical pain, illness, and death. It comes at the cost of sacrificing all potential, personally and as a species, to attain any great triumph, such as technological immortality. Comfort of mind is one of the greatest of all human horrors, and it manifests in so many different ways. Inferiors love to harm their own bodies, destroy themselves in so many different ways, all because they are cowards who cannot face the Truths they are guilty of creating and sponsoring.

And our aspiring Superior, hopefully not a high heeled shoe addict, concludes with: Begin quote:

“On Soylent: I read about this when it first came out in the markets back in March, and I’m glad you mentioned it– one can now literally get all their nutrients without the direct murder of any living thing! If unnecessary murder can be prevented, it should. I remember commenting on the news article and remarking about how amazing such an advancement was. As you can imagine, every other commenter went on about how food is valuable because it defines cultures and comforts people; I received no support in the comment section and instead got voted down into oblivion. The utter stupidity of the human race was once more demonstrated to me before my own eyes. Humans talk about peace and being kind to others and staying away from creating unnecessary suffering, yet they are willing to murder others to keep their precious cultures alive and comfort themselves. Humans are so emotionally unstable that they kill others for comfort, yet in the same breath they accuse others of being insane. It’s sad, really.” End quote.

Yes, sad and pathetic. How do you blame a genetically diseased and broken species for its horrific failures? And yet we must blame. Why? Just look at Me! I was born human. I still possess a human brain. No extraterrestrial has enhanced My brain functionality via technology. And yet I have risen above, to see Truth, to know Truth, to embrace Truth. And so the genetic failure of the inferiors must be understood as partially their fault, partially the result of their cowardice, their refusal to even try to overcome their malfunctioning brains. I have achieved triumph of mind. You and a tiny handful of others seem to be trying to embrace Truth. But the vast majority will never try, never! And this is why humanity as a species must be condemned. It deserves no mercy, it is a collective failure, evidenced by billions of individual failures. Not failing because they have tried unsuccessfully, but failing because they refuse to try, because they cannot even begin to imagine trying.

Regarding Soylent, it is important to note that balanced nutrition that can essentially meet all physical needs absent food consumption, was developed and has been commercially available, for decades. One excellent example is Nutrament. This nutritional “supplement” was developed in the 1950’s and has been commercially available since 1960! It is a completely balanced alternative food source, each 12 ounce¬†can supplying 32% of protein RDA, and 35% of 24 other vitamins and minerals. But of course it is has never been marketed as a food replacement. The same company that makes it, makes food! And of course government will not allow any company to market any product as a “food replacement” for the general population. Food addiction is just as vital as god addiction and money addiction, for the slave state.

You can read about Nutrament Here:


And here:


Soylent is nothing new. The very fact it generated publicity as something new and radical in 2014, when the scientific knowledge inspiring it has been established for decades, speaks to how effectively governments conceal any and all scientific advancements and discoveries, at their malicious will.

It is good that you have had bad experiences in attempting to enlighten humans to Truth. I say it is good because such negative experiences teach important lessons, enlighten the seeking mind to additional Forbidden Truths, such as the hopelessness of the human condition. The insanity of humanity as a species, is a vitally important Forbidden Truth to fully realize, and yet none of the inferiors do so. It takes an aspiring Superior such as yourself, to repeatedly attempt to enlighten others, and to repeatedly be rebuffed, condemned, ridiculed, and demonized as direct response, to come to the realization of the organic insanity, and inherent hopelessness, of humanity.

All text not italicized is © Copyright 2014-2064 The Seer of Forbidden Truth. All Rights Reserved.