Blast From The Past: Lizzie Halliday, serial killer

The descriptive phrase and 21st century demonizing label of “serial killer” did not exist in 1906, but of course there were serial killers back then. There have always been serial killers, for as long as humanity has existed, because there have always been victims of trauma, suffering, abuse, and injustice who recognized, on some level of consciousness, that the malevolent external destruction of their universe of Self, granted them not merely a right, but a full-fledged entitlement to at least try to destroy the universes of others.

How many thousands of Martyrs exorcised their True Reality rage and hate via serial murder, in absolute anonymity over the past 50,000+ years, simply because there was no centralized media structure in place?? Let us reflect upon the historical context of the act of serial murder, and its practitioners, as we savor the tale of one of the early media stars of reflective rage, her name already lost and forgotten to the Unwashed Masses, and even to most true crime aficionados.

Illegal serial murder has always been rare, isolated and marooned expressions of Truth, because every society has successfully demonized the serial killer. 100 years ago, the demonization was achieved via labels of insanity, slurs such as “maniac” and “lunatic”. Today the demonization is achieved via perverse and deranged morally hypocritical judgment of evil and bad. From sick to evil, we must bear witness to the devolutionary death spiral of a species which deserves to be serially murdered with full malice aforethought, a species that has never been able to recognize itself as the incubator, sponsor, and host of all insanity and of all malice.

“The nurse fell face downward, and the woman fell astride her shoulders as she reached down and plucked away a pair of small scissors that were hanging at Miss Wicks’ girdle. With these she began stabbing her victim to death. In all she inflicted more than 200 wounds on the face and body of the girl…” :

https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=799&dat=19061102&id=nIMvAAAAIBAJ&sjid=NEgDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6995,3191028&hl=en

Let us honor Lizzie, as we honor all outward expressions of True Reality-based rage and hate.

halliday1

 Lizzie HallidayAll Text not in italics is Copyright © 2014-2064 The Seer of Forbidden Truth. All Rights Reserved.

6 comments

  1. SEER, it’s ironic how societies have twisted the true meaning behind a serial killer’s motive, from that of insane to evil. By societies declaring serial killers as evil, they are justified and given approval by others to kill them

    Like

    1. You are correct. Both definitions are absolutely and completely invalid, as the “rogue”, independently operating individual serial killer has always been nothing more than a pale but accurate reflection of the deranged and genocidally homicidal functional and operational structure of the human society and government he was born into, enslaved by, and victimized by. To define the serial killer as insane, is a denial tactic by which the collective insanity of the existing society guilty of creating and inspiring the “insanity” of the individual, is rejected.

      That Forbidden Truth being clearly understood, it is certainly accurate to conclude that the massive social shift in demonization tactic of these created victims, from insane to evil, which has absolutely occurred over the past 500+ years within all co-called “civilized”, 1st world societies, demonstrates the ongoing and increasing devolution of the species, as it continues to deepen its universally sadistic and homicidal public policy pathology.

      In other words, the greater need of all “law-abiding citizens” to sadistically revel in the brutal victimization and legal murder of their created victims, while maintaing a perverse illusion of moral justification, is greatly enhanced by shifting the demonization label they apply, from insanity to evil.

      Like

  2. “The nurse fell face downward, and the woman fell astride her shoulders as she reached down and plucked away a pair of small scissors that were hanging at Miss Wicks’ girdle. With these she began stabbing her victim to death. In all she inflicted more than 200 wounds on the face and body of the girl…”

    Beautiful.

    I reserve a special amount of respect for female seekers of cathartic vengeance. This is because, unlike yourself, sir, I DO believe that human females are objectively, demonstrably inferior to human males, and within the context of truth.

    In every almost every mammal species, the male dominates the female. Physically, psychologically, sexually and socially. This isn’t the fault of female animals, it is simply the way evolution created them.

    But it is important to note, not only has nature given males the desire to dominate females, but it has given females the DESIRE TO BE DOMINATED. Again, not their fault, and an unfortunate necessity of animal biology.

    In general, females do not think for themselves like men do. For example, a female will adopt a political stance or a philosophy only based on her social “in group”. They are mindless chameleons.

    For example, a male can identify as a socialist, and can be in an in-group of other socialists, BUT, he can still analyse his beliefs and decide to become a capitalist, by his own independent process of thought, independent of his social group. This is because males have genuine CONVICTIONS, and are genuinely INTERESTED in a search for truth, flawed as this political example may be. A male socialist can decide to become a conservative, based on his conscience and desire for truth alone.

    A female will almost NEVER do this. Females have no innate interest in truth, and will only follow their social group, or what is fashionable.

    I was once heavily into Neo-nazi philosophy. Other Neo nazis would often post pictures online of “sexy neo-nazi girls”, erroneously thinking these women are genuine in their beliefs. I corrected them by telling them that the females in these pictures, waving nazi flags and dying their hair blonde, only did so because they were either dating a neo nazi male, or were in a social group who were Neo nazi. If these females were ever dumped by their boyfriends, they could easily find a black boyfriend, and all of a sudden change their whole persona to Rastafarian. Females, for the most part, are as shallow as a puddle, while males are as deep as the ocean.

    Another example is a lack of interest. How many females have you seen who have developed a hobby, a talent, a skill, an interest, and only because of sincere interest? This is almost never seen. In general, almost no females spend hours at a skatepark learning to ride the half pipe, no female spends years in her bedroom learning to become a sick lead guitarist, no female spends months in the school gym practicing wrestling moves. UNLESS their social in group/current boyfriend expects them to. Women have no interests outside of their physical and social appearance, and manipulate it to fit certain situations. They are mindless and empty, and like water, take on the shape of any container you put them into.

    For this reason, female killers deserve amount of respect, for the rare ability to transcend the shallow artificiality that characterises their gender.

    Like

    1. You express interesting points regarding women and their personas. Women are coerced into doing things by others, as wearing makeup and high-heels. I am a woman because society bestowed that label on me, which was not my choice, so as a result, I tend to act and behave like a woman. Women are treated like chattel and are exploited and abused because of it. It’s too bad women aren’t aware of it, although, some are, but not enough

      Like

    2. I reserve a special amount of respect for female seekers of cathartic vengeance. This is because, unlike yourself, sir, I DO believe that human females are objectively, demonstrably inferior to human males, and within the context of truth.

      In every almost every mammal species, the male dominates the female. Physically, psychologically, sexually and socially. This isn’t the fault of female animals, it is simply the way evolution created them.

      But it is important to note, not only has nature given males the desire to dominate females, but it has given females the DESIRE TO BE DOMINATED. Again, not their fault, and an unfortunate necessity of animal biology.

      Your perspective is flawed and your conclusion is invalid. As an initial reference point, a need to dominate others, given human organic and environmentally induced brain function defects, does not indicate or demonstrate superiority, but rather a traumatic response by the individual to both his childhood and his ongoing adult inability to exert proper control and determination over his own life path. The domination of others expresses the inability of the individual to attain Self-determination.

      To be certain, the physiological design structure of male and female brains does differ, if you compare a fair statistical group. And this difference can be expected to “naturally” result in certain behavioral and reality-perception differences along gender lines, again within a statistically valid group-to-group comparison. I am not disputing these factual Truths. But the type of personal need for domination that you are referring to in your comment, does not speak to gender superiority on the part of males. It speaks to the fact that boys are victimized in somewhat different ways than girls, and even more importantly, they are socially indoctrinated to seek out, and “rewarded” via bribe by society, for choosing somewhat different behavioral and ideological life paths.

      The role of gender different brain physiology is minor, compared to the role of social indoctrination and conditioning via terror and the false illusion of reward, in rendering the typical female human docile and submissive to the typical male human. The desire of the typical female to be dominated and victimized, not merely within sexual contexts, but in terms of all life path avenues, reflects the Truth that every modern society instructs females, from birth, via overt indoctrination, that it is normal and natural for them to perceive themselves as inferior to males, and that they will be rewarded for accepting and for expressing this personal inferiority within their behavioral and life path choices.

      As an example, this is why men are far more likely to propose marriage to women, than women are to propose marriage to men.

      “In general, females do not think for themselves like men do. For example, a female will adopt a political stance or a philosophy only based on her social “in group”. They are mindless chameleons.”

      In general, females are more greatly rewarded by society, for mindlessly following the hive mind. The relative lack of independent thinking by females, compared to males, is not primarily due to organic difference in brain physiology, but is primarily due to greater external social indoctrination and demonization of mind independence, on a gender-specific level. It is important to understand that this is one of the specific freedom illusions marketed to men by society, that it is their inalienable right to dominate women and to impose their reality perceptions upon women. In this exact same vein, the freedom illusion heavily marketed to women, is that they possess an inalienable right to dominate children, and to impose their reality perceptions upon children. It is all a ponzi scheme by society, intended to maintain and increase universal subservience to the hive mind by granting illusions of power and freedom to specific classes of individuals, over other specific classes of individuals.

      If you study history, you find many examples of female humans challenging the status quo and the hive mind just as radically as males do. In anarchy, you find Lucy Parsons, Emma Goldman, and many others. In radical philosophy, you find Valerie Jean Solanas, way ahead of her time in revealing Forbidden Truth:

      “Life” in this “society” being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of “society” being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation and eliminate the male sex.”–Valerie Solanas.

      Are there more radical thinking males than females?? Perhaps. Perhaps not. We must never forget that society and its media propagandists control who becomes publicly known, and who is relegated to the obscurity of forced anonymity. Throughout history, women who openly expressed radical ideology have been much more readily committed to mental institutions and even outright murdered by their society, than men.

      “For example, a male can identify as a socialist, and can be in an in-group of other socialists, BUT, he can still analyse his beliefs and decide to become a capitalist, by his own independent process of thought, independent of his social group. This is because males have genuine CONVICTIONS, and are genuinely INTERESTED in a search for truth, flawed as this political example may be. A male socialist can decide to become a conservative, based on his conscience and desire for truth alone.

      A female will almost NEVER do this. Females have no innate interest in truth, and will only follow their social group, or what is fashionable.”

      You are incorrect. The typical male is no more interested in recognizing and embracing any of the primary Forbidden Truths, than the typical female. The typical male is more interested in pretending to engage in a quest for Truth, because society encourages such a fake and false pursuit, marketing it as a form of freedom, more heavily to men than to women. The human being is a sheeple, mindlessly following the hive directive, this is equally True for men and for women.

      The “innate” interest in Truth that you claim men possess, is not valid. It is an interest in Self-delusion, the male convincing himself that he is engaging in a Truth-quest, when in reality he is not doing so. More men than women practice this specific Self-delusion, that is correct. But it does not express a genuine interest in or effort to recognize and embrace Truth. It is a form of mind shackle, disguised as freedom and personal empowerment.

      On average, men will spend more time than women considering the relative merits of capitalism, socialism, democracy, dictatorship, how best to modify government structures, etc… But is this part of any Truth quest?? No, of course not! A Truth quest would demand answers as to why the structure of government exists, it would out government as a system of universal slavery, it would out humanity itself as hopelessly broken, if it cannot thrive absent the slave shackle of government.

      In terms of radical Truth seeking and realization, the percentage of both males and females who engage in such courageous dissections of reality and of their own minds, is immeasurably small, statistically non-existent. I see no evidence at all to conclude that more males than females seek and achieve this very rare feat.

      “I was once heavily into Neo-nazi philosophy. Other Neo nazis would often post pictures online of “sexy neo-nazi girls”, erroneously thinking these women are genuine in their beliefs. I corrected them by telling them that the females in these pictures, waving nazi flags and dying their hair blonde, only did so because they were either dating a neo nazi male, or were in a social group who were Neo nazi. If these females were ever dumped by their boyfriends, they could easily find a black boyfriend, and all of a sudden change their whole persona to Rastafarian. Females, for the most part, are as shallow as a puddle, while males are as deep as the ocean.”

      The fact that you were once a racialist indicates how susceptible you were and are, and all humans are, to societal and governmental promotion of false and pseudo-rebellion. Racialism is overtly promoted by all societies and governments, as it obscures and conceals the universal victimization of all at the hands of government and the hive mind of social control. Racialism pits victim against victim, so that all may continue to be brutally victimized without capacity to identify and target their victimizer.

      And guess what? The “gender war” and gender bias does exactly the same thing, and is overtly promoted by all societies and governments for the exact same reason. You are using the illusion of female inferiority, to make yourself feel empowered, to convince yourself that you are on a quest for Truth greater and more difficult than what other humans are capable of. But the Truth is, this very ideological concept, of inherent male superiority of mind and brain function as a natural law, is on a direct par with your now-rejected ideological concept of embraced racialism. You have simply traded in one false ideological platform, for a different false ideological platform, to create/foster an illusion of personal enlightenment of mind. So very human!

      To go back to and elaborate upon a point I was making earlier: Yes, women follow the hive mind more readily than men, on average. But men build, promote, popularize, and sustain the hive mind to a greater degree than women, even as they profess to be “deeper” thinkers and to more readily challenge the status quo and what is imposed upon them. This profession is invalid, and upon Forbidden Truth analysis, it renders the average man more guilty and responsible for the ongoing failure of humanity to positively change and evolve, than the average woman.

      “Another example is a lack of interest. How many females have you seen who have developed a hobby, a talent, a skill, an interest, and only because of sincere interest? This is almost never seen. In general, almost no females spend hours at a skatepark learning to ride the half pipe, no female spends years in her bedroom learning to become a sick lead guitarist, no female spends months in the school gym practicing wrestling moves. UNLESS their social in group/current boyfriend expects them to. Women have no interests outside of their physical and social appearance, and manipulate it to fit certain situations. They are mindless and empty, and like water, take on the shape of any container you put them into.”

      Once again, your analysis is extremely shallow, to borrow from your water analogy. Humans obsessively focus on functionally useless hobbies and skills, as a mind diversion from engaging in genuine Truth quests, or facing up to the horrific realities and Truths of human and their personal existence. Such obsessive focus is a diversion and a distraction.

      A very limited number of physical skills, such as shooting guns, constructing deadly devices, developing physical health and “survivalist” abilities, are genuinely valuable and worthy of extensive personal focus. Hobbies which provide consistent personal pleasure not dependent upon any outside interference, such as sexual masturbation, are also valuable and directly empowering. But the typical human, male and female, wastes their mind potential pursuing a lifelong series of hobbies and interests which, consciously or far more often subconsciously, are intended simply to provide diversion and distraction from Truth.

      Is spending thousands of hours learning how to skateboard or play the guitar extremely well, comparable to obsessive masturbation, or spending an equal amount of time learning how to shoot guns very well, or develop other “life and death” survival skills?? No. Even compared to masturbation, sexual climax is a biological drive, and its achievement at will, on demand, empowers the Self on a level beyond that of a “social skill” such as skateboarding or playing the guitar.

      It is not my intent to specifically denigrate learning how to do things such as you describe, or spending some time doing them. All Self-focus can be an expression of Self-love and foster strength of mind. But to claim that a gender-specific “greater” obsession with perfecting such essentially useless social skills indicates gender superiority, absolutely fails to hold water upon Forbidden Truth analysis.

      “For this reason, female killers deserve amount of respect, for the rare ability to transcend the shallow artificiality that characterises their gender.”

      All individual seekers of externalized personal vengeance deserve our respect, for challenging the hive mind of universal Self-harm, Self-destruction, and Self-murder via suicide which is perversely promoted by all societies and governments. If there are fewer female serial and mass murderers than male, we must dissect the reasons why this is so, with an open and Truth-seeking mind analysis, free of the gender prejudice and bias which is directly promoted by and within the societal hive mind.

      Placing all or most of the blame on genetics, fails to reveal or express Forbidden Truth. Blaming the female gender as a whole for this reflective rage deficiency also fails to reveal/express Forbidden Truth. Both males and females are trapped within multiple webs of submission, devaluation, personal impotence of mind and of body, Self-hatred, Self-harm, Self-murder. Gender bias is a social structure which strengthens and builds these webs. As such it is not compatible with with any top-level Truth quest.

      Like

You have just read something brilliant. You can comment on it here. All comments are screened prior to publication.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s