An Atheist Understanding of Self, god, & religion

I received a brief but thought-provoking question concerning the “meaning” of atheism, how the atheist can be expected to perceive his own atheism. The question is enigmatic because it speaks to how external control of how individuals perceive themselves, limits and destroys the capacity of the individual to proactively seize Truth and factual reality, and apply it to revolutionary conclusions and personal mandates of radical change.

Here is the question, followed by my brilliant dissection of Forbidden Truth:

“Seer, i thought that being atheist means that there is no life after death. Am i wrong?”

Yes, you are wrong. You are very wrong. There are several different, fully valid and appropriate definitional parameters that may be applied to the term “atheist”, but to posit this term to decree that there is “no life after death”, is not only inaccurate, but absolutely betrays Truth itself. No sane and Superior atheist could accept such a shallow, superficial, and blatantly false definition.

If you seek Truth, I invite you to consider the following appropriate definitions of how atheism should be understood and applied by Superior minds. Singularly and in combination, all of the following definitions are valid and express Truth:

Atheist: An individual who consciously recognizes and rejects the absurdity and the falsehood of all supernatural belief systems involving both organized and non-organized religion, and the concept of a god creature existing.

Atheist: An individual who understands the unique singularity of every existence, and in honor and in praise of the glory of Self, affirmatively embraces a personal right, need, and entitlement to preserve his own existence for an infinite period of time, utilizing any and all valid, scientific and technological methodologies which may or may not be readily available at a specific point in time.

Atheist: An individual who recognizes that his own physical death is unacceptable and must be proactively prevented via scientific and technological means, due to the factual reality that to die is to be retroactively unborn, to be eternally lost, and to have never existed at any point in time, past, present, or future.

Atheist: An individual who declares war upon and against religion, as a sponsor of death, and who declares war upon and against government, as the sponsor of religion, and who declares war upon and against death itself, decreeing death to be his mortal foe and his mortal enemy, seeking to negate his existence for all of eternity, past, present, and future.

Atheist: An individual who rejects all belief, renounces the very concept of belief, not only as relates to religion and god, but the very philosophical and ideological platforms under which any belief, in anything, is given credence, respect, and consideration by humans, their societies, and their governments.

Atheist: An individual who demands an end to death, so that he may begin to live, within the understanding that to die in the future, is to already be dead in the present moment.

Atheist: An individual who recognizes Himself to be entitled to every right, every power, and every privilege bestowed by any and every religious text upon any and every mythical god creature.

Atheist: An individual who has affirmatively chosen and directly achieved the feat of rejecting, renouncing, hating, destroying, dismembering, cannibalizing, and excreting every mythical god creature that has been imposed upon him by his society, his culture, his fellow humans, and his government(s).

Atheist: A lover of Self, therefore a hater of god and religion.

Atheist: A lover of Truth and factual reality, therefore a hater of all religious, supernatural, and afterlife mythologies, which betray Truth and express contempt for factual reality.

Atheist: An individual who consciously understands that because no individual can ever exist if he suffers the fate of dying, such fate cannot be allowed to occur, and he must accept and assume personal responsibility for preventing his own death from occurring, not via the embrace of any belief, but by demanding and achieving technological immortality for Himself.

Now, some inferiors will claim that these definitions are far too broad, that atheist must be more narrowly defined. No! Atheism must be broadened, it must be understood as a philosophy of life, not as a mere rejection of a narrow and specific belief. Only within such an understanding, can the atheist use his rejection of the insane god myth, as a springboard to attacking and defeating the actual social goals and mandates of religion, which are very broad and parasitically malicious, and which include brainwashing and coercing all of humanity to accept, embrace, and welcome their own deaths, which occur as societally sponsored murders, and cause retroactive unbirth.

All Text not in italics is Copyright © 2014-2064 The Seer of Forbidden Truth. All Rights Reserved.

9 comments

  1. To be an atheist it is not necessary to hate everything that I do not like. As an example you write – “A lover of Self, therefore a hater of god and religion.” I agree that you should be a lover of Self. But I do not want to be a hater of anything in this world.

    The reason is that there is no good and bad in nature. Do we say apple is good and orange is bad? We don’t. Similarly, we do not say sun is good and moon is bad, or rain is good and shine is bad, or dog is good and cat is bad. Then why would you say Mr. X is good and Mr. Y is bad? All humans are objects of nature. We should not discriminate things in nature; we accept nature as it is.

    Note that there is no freewill. This is quite obvious. Have you ever done anything without any reasons? No you have not. Thus reasons come before you take action. Your present action is controlled by your past reasons – and that is the definition of destiny. The entire universe is guided by a global plan or global destiny. Our individual destiny is derived from that global plan. No one has any control of the universe. There should not be any reasons to feel frustrated and remain angry. Everybody is playing his role according to the laws of nature. Why then blame anyone? For more details take a look at https://theoryofsouls.wordpress.com/

    Like

    1. “To be an atheist it is not necessary to hate everything that I do not like. As an example you write – “A lover of Self, therefore a hater of god and religion.” I agree that you should be a lover of Self. But I do not want to be a hater of anything in this world.”

      To be an atheist it is necessary to hate god and religion, because those who embrace god and religion hate you, as they hate the very structure of life itself. Religion is the worship of death, the worship of universal death. Religion is the demand that you personally die, and it is made by the religious, by those who believe in and worship god.

      Only inferiors make decisions based on what they want, at the cost of what actually is, and at the cost of logic and reflective reasoning. Whatever proactively seeks and demands your eternal destruction and retroactive unbirth, deserves to be hated by you, and must be hated by you, in the name of reflective Truth. Otherwise you are betraying and compromising love of Self. Whether or not you choose to consciously face up to this Truth, does not alter it. Self-love cannot be subjectively determined. It must be objectively determined.

      “The reason is that there is no good and bad in nature. Do we say apple is good and orange is bad? We don’t. Similarly, we do not say sun is good and moon is bad, or rain is good and shine is bad, or dog is good and cat is bad. Then why would you say Mr. X is good and Mr. Y is bad? All humans are objects of nature. We should not discriminate things in nature; we accept nature as it is.”

      You are correct in that there is no good or bad sentient intent in nature. But there are good and bad consequences. What harms Me is bad. The passive acceptance of injustice and harm, merely because it originates in nature, cannot be justified within the umbrella of Self-love and the consciously realized entitlement of personal godhood which the achievement of limitless and unconditional love of Self, mandates.

      If you read My brilliant texts, you will note that I do not negatively judge individuals, recognizing each and every one as a created victim of external injustice. But this does not negate My sacred right to hate, and to seek personal vengeance, and to reflect personal injustice. Further, My refusal to embrace the prejudice that is personal judgment, places upon Me a genuine obligation to hate and to condemn organized human structures, such as government, education, the family unit, religion, and god worship, structures which are guilty of universally victimizing and destroying humanity as a collective whole.

      We must not accept nature as it is. There is nothing holy in nature. Nature is a fatally flawed structure which lacks all sentient will, a structure which metes out injustice by virtue of its own mindlessness, its own random dysfunction. To accept nature as it is, is to embrace death. To embrace death is to betray Self. Religion and god are the toxic and diseased deceptions deployed by society and government, to inspire and to effect this betrayal of Self, which cannot be seperated from hatred of Self. Whenever the individual chooses to allow Himself to be harmed, he is expressing and manifesting hatred towards Himself.

      What is holy and sacred? Me. I am holy and sacred, unique and irreplaceable, singular and infinitely precious. The universe is My creation, and My brain is the creator of the universe. Hatred of religion, god, and nature, is honorable, necessary, and the most natural of all responses, to all that seeks to destroy the universe of Me, be it via conscious will, as is the case of religion and god worship, or mindless dysfunctionality, such as is the case with nature.

      “Note that there is no freewill. This is quite obvious.”

      It is not obvious, nor is it factually valid. The issue is multilayered and complex. We are all reflections of all that has been imposed, inflicted, and indoctrinated upon us. Your life path choices will reflect this external imposition, to one degree or another.

      But it is possible to pierce the matrix, to become an outsider looking in, to transcend your own humanity, and the tiny handful who achieve this feat, achieve the capacity to choose what to reflect, if to reflect, and when to reflect. Which does not translate to absolute free will, certainly not. But it does represent a genuine distinction from the mindless, consciously oblivious reflections of the unwashed masses of humans.

      The complexity comes from this: The very process of transcending your own humanity, as I have done, is inspired by the reflective impositions of others, therefore the original inspiration is not an expression of independently free will, even if the end result allows for freedom of choice which far exceeds that of the human drone who remains matrix-trapped.

      “Have you ever done anything without any reasons? No you have not. Thus reasons come before you take action.”

      Conceived reasons for executing personal choices may be either valid or invalid, rooted in factual reality or the projection of absolute fantasy and false deductive process, within the envelope of what constitutes Truth itself. But within this understanding, it is fair to reject the concept of absolute free will, within personal choice, independent of all past impositions upon reality perception. To possess absolute free will would require that all past impositions upon the Self be absolutely and completely negated, erased from all capacity to imprint upon personal consciousness, and this is not something that even I, a top-level transcendee of My humanity, have achieved.

      “Your present action is controlled by your past reasons – and that is the definition of destiny.”

      No. It is at this point that you stray from the path of Truth. My present actions are controlled and limited, appropriately so, by the combination of what has been imposed upon Me externally, and the sum total of all Truth and factual reality which I have actualized within My conscious mind, and My intellectual capacity to make choices and decisions which violate neither My own personal True Reality, nor objective Truth, itself. To be clear, this is my personal triumph of the mind as a Superior, not typical or accurately descriptive of human thought, behavior, or choice. For the typical human, both thought and behavior are determined by pathological brain dysfunction, the rejection of reality and of Truth, reasons deduced via a lack of sane reasoning, and the embrace of warped reality perception, of which religion and god worship is a prime illustration.

      Those who “believe” in destiny as it is defined by society, and as you appear to define it within your comment, fall victim to mystical thinking and are guilty of abdicating the development of ownership of Self and of mind, which the top-level Superior achieves. It is fair to say that there are very specific things which I am destined not to do, because in doing these specific things I would be violating both My own True Reality, and objective Truth. But it would not be fair to say that there are very specific things which I am destined to specifically do, because the mind ownership I have achieved allows Me a degree of freedom of will, within parameters of Truth and True Reality, which preclude and negate the mystical pull of destiny.

      “The entire universe is guided by a global plan or global destiny. Our individual destiny is derived from that global plan.”

      This is where you completely veer off the course of Truth. There is no sentient will in the “universe”, just as there is no sentient will in religion, in the myth of god, or in the functions and dysfunctions of nature. You have fallen victim to mystical thinking, created a fable on the same level as any organized religion. There is no plan or destinty absent sentient will, absent conscious intent, and “the universe” lacks all sentient will, lacks all conscious intent. The organization of the universe is random, scientific phenomena such as gravity or oxygen do not alter this fact.

      The destiny of the individual inferior is controlled by the limitation of his reality perceptions, his refusal to embrace the Forbidden Truths, and the sum total of what has been externally imposed upon him from the moment of his biological conception, through every moment in time up to the present moment of his perceived existence. There is no global plan or destiny, controlled by the “universe”, in play.

      “No one has any control of the universe.”

      I have much control of the universe, having embraced My obligation to Self and to Truth, to create a universe in which I achieve the omnipotence to which I am entitled. But My degree of control is limited by humans, and their inferior, pathetic minds, their rejection of Truth.

      There should not be any reasons to feel frustrated and remain angry. Everybody is playing his role according to the laws of nature. Why then blame anyone?

      Nature is a failure. Nature is dysfunctional. The laws of nature are unjust. The laws of nature harm Me, and are therefore unacceptable. Nature must be recognized as a personal enemy, even if rage and hate are reserved for toxic and diseased man-made structures such as religion, god, and government. We must hate what is consciously choosing to destroy us, as individuals. Nature itself, lacks such conscious intent. Therefore, hating nature can be understood as a waste of time and focus. But nature is still our mortal enemy, it must be treated as such, it must be prevented, by any and all possible means, from harming Me.

      To worship nature is to worship death, the same horrific and impossible to justify choice, as the embrace of religion and belief in a god creature, both of which are deployed by humanity to coerce and to brainwash the universal embrace of individual death. Of course we must be angry. Of course we must blame and we must hate. We must hate humanity, victims and yet collaborators in creating and maintaining the matrix. We must hate the human structures which are deployed to destroy us, to murder the universe of Me. And even if we do not proactively hate nature, as we areabsolutely entitled to do, we must blame nature. We must recognize nature as our enemy, not something to be respected and honored, but a rogue force of harm, attacking and destroying us.

      Nature is not the antidote to religion. Honoring the right of nature to harm Me, is a betrayal of Self and of Truth just as great as honoring the right of religion or god to harm Me. The antodote to religion is Truth and love of Self, and this same antidote must be applied to our understanding of and relationship with, nature.

      To the commenter: Please note that your last sentence, containing a link to your blog, has been deleted from this reply, because I will not use My own writings to promote a philosophy or ideology which compromises Truth.

      Like

      1. “…because I will not use My own writings to promote a philosophy or ideology which compromises Truth.” But shouldn’t first Truth be established by discussions? This discussion should include going to other texts in the literature. A scientific investigation is necessary. Do you not agree with scientific approaches?

        Like

        1. …because I will not use My own writings to promote a philosophy or ideology which compromises Truth.

          “But shouldn’t first Truth be established by discussions? This discussion should include going to other texts in the literature. A scientific investigation is necessary. Do you not agree with scientific approaches?”

          Truth is established via independent investigation conducted by Superior minds. Interactive discussioins almost never lead to Truth realizations. It is internal dialogue, an endless debate conducted with Self, via a free and open mind which has transcended the human matrix, which leads to Truth realizations.

          There are a million different toxic paths of deception. The inferior wastes his entire imaginary existence on an insincere quest for Truth, grasping upon fable after fable, distraction after distraction. Your fables are less popular than christianity. That doesn’t render them worthy of My overt promotion. I promote only Truth, the Truths I have realized via relentless, independent analysis by a Superior mind.

          Science itself represents Truth. But scientific research and scientific methodologies have been subverted by humanity, to render Truth quests impossible for the average human to undertake. Witness the scientists who insist that religion and science are not mutually exclusive, when in Truth they are. Look at the scientists, more than 99.9% of all scientists, who refuse to openly and publicly condemn the insane god myth, who refuse to label belief in god as a devastating mental illness, which it of course is. Who refuse to demand that all children be proactively protected from being infected by adults and by human society with the communicable mind virus that is religion.

          So no, while I honor science as being a necessary and direct gateway to Truth, I do not honor those who demand a scientific approach and scientific investigation to discerning and discovering Truth, only to use this argument to inject ideological and theoretical concepts which do not stand up to basic scrutiny of logic, rationality, and deductive reasoning.

          Your web pages promote mythology and the embrace of irrational thinking and illogical conclusions which differ from mainstream religion, but still pollute the mind and hobble genuine Truth quests. Therefore they will not be directly promoted by Me, although I graciously allowed your self-promotion link to remain within your original reply to Me, and can therefore still be accessed by any reader of this blog.

          Like

          1. “Truth is established via independent investigation conducted by Superior minds. Interactive discussioins almost never lead to Truth realizations. It is internal dialogue, an endless debate conducted with Self, via a free and open mind which has transcended the human matrix, which leads to Truth realizations.” – I like this idea and I call it yogic meditation.

            But doesn’t it contradict – “Science itself represents Truth”? For, science is not created by yogic meditation.

            However, it seems you believe in science. Can you give an example from science that represents truth?

            Like

            1. Truth is established via independent investigation conducted by Superior minds. Interactive discussions almost never lead to Truth realizations. It is internal dialogue, an endless debate conducted with Self, via a free and open mind which has transcended the human matrix, which leads to Truth realizations.

              “– I like this idea and I call it yogic meditation.

              But doesn’t it contradict – “Science itself represents Truth”? For, science is not created by yogic meditation.”

              No, it does not contradict anything. There is science, and then there is fake science, pseudo-science, mythology dressed up to impersonate science. Science, legitimate science, represents Truth.

              “However, it seems you believe in science. Can you give an example from science that represents truth?”

              Science is not something you believe in. Belief itself, compromises all scientific analysis as well as all quests to recognize and embrace Truth.

              Legitimate science expresses and reveals Truth and factual reality. Gravity expresses Truth. To be alive requires brain cell viability, a factual Truth. Reincarnation as traditionally defined by humans defies scientifical law and is therefore a scientifically impossible to achieve mythology. The survival of a soul beyond physical death of an individual brain, is a scientific impossibility. Those last two cut to the core of the mythologies you are promoting at your blog, based upon the limited scanning I have generously provided to it.

              Legitimate science must be understood as both the affirmative expression and discovery of valid facts, and the affirmative debunking and deflation of invalid myths, illusions, and delusions, delegitimized via a complete lack of scientific validity.

              Like

                1. Gravity expresses Truth.

                  “– What truth it expresses?”

                  The Truth that a gravitational force field exists and imposes a universal standard of limitation on forward motion which can only be defied via the presentation of an opposing force. Gravity is a scientific Truth in dynamic, observable, provable action.

                  And now I will stop answering your questions, because I am busy expanding My universe. I suggest you read all the essays I have posted to this blog, along with my 1 million+ word Manifesto of Forbidden Truth at:

                  http://forbiddentruth.8k.com

                  If you have additional questions after consuming all of My writings, and if your questions meet my quality control standards, they may be answered.

                  Like

You have just read something brilliant. You can comment on it here. All comments are screened prior to publication.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s