On Nature, Meat, Cannibalism, and the Eating of Food

This is a brilliantly insightful update  to My essay titled Food and the Politics of Institutionalized Genocide, which I posted to the blog approximately one week ago. I strongly suggest that you read that blog post first, because all knowledge is evolutionary in nature, building upon itself, and only inferiors leap into the middle of any structure without first dissecting its originating tentacles:


Also, for clarity, it is important that readers be aware that this post is being made in reply to a private email. All text from the emailer will be in italics, beginning with the words “begin quote”, and ending with the words “end quote”, while My reply is in regular lettering. I welcome email replies to My essays, and if they meet My quality control standards, reserve the right to reply to them either privately by email, or publicly via this blog. Public replies absolutely will respect the anonymity of the emailer. However, if you do not desire your words to appear anonymously in this public forum, you should not email Me at all.

Okay, our thoughtful reader says: Begin quote: “On nature and using nature as a moral benchmark: one thing I have noticed from your writings is that nature is described as a moral benchmark of sorts, which I do not find accurate. Nature is abstract, with no mind, no cognition. If nature was moral, humans would not be here. But nature only favors whatever reproduces the most, kills the most, steals the most. We must detach ourselves from the idea that we should do whatever is “natural” because there are many instincts, even in non-human creatures, that are completely and utterly insane and lack all logic.” End quote.

Your interpretation of My writings is not accurate. I will clarify: Nature deserves absolute respect and recognition as a valid structure, only when directly contrasted to that which is unnatural, or supernatural. Nature is real, an evolving structure imposing itself upon the universe, albeit lacking all sentience. There is nothing inherently “good” via the functionality of nature, but it is “good”, and vitally important, for seekers of Truth to embrace the validity of nature as a functioning structure. Nature lacks all morality, it does not deserve any respect for what it does, but it does deserve open acknowledgment as something real, which must be dealt with as a valid force, even as many of its unjust consequences must be rejected and overcome.

If you read My brilliant writings with an open mind, you see that many of My comments are directly opposed to what humans call “natural” law. Things such as death, motherhood, subservience to your brain rather than proactive ownership of your brain, can be said to directly defy natural law, and I accept this definition because I reject the authority of nature to impose its will upon Me. It has no such right. It is a structurally legitimate force, but this does not render the impacts this force has upon any of us, legitimate.

Nature is in every measurable way, our enemy, and must be consciously acknowledged and understood as such. But our battle against nature must always be rooted within Truth. We must never embrace unnatural or supernatural ideas or structures, while engaging in this battle. I vehemently support, and absolutely demand, things such as the eradication of death via technology, in open defiance of nature and its supposed “laws”, as invalidly judged by the inferior human masses. Death is not a natural law, it is a currently valid consequence of the natural process of physical aging, which we must defy and overcome.

Are there any natural “laws”, which must be blindly accepted and never challenged? Only one: Nature is real, it exists and it blindly imposes itself upon us. Everything it does to us must be openly and consciously challenged, within the realization of infinite, sacred right to Self-determination.

The Superior demands and personally achieves the triumphs of intellect over emotion, Self-determination via strength and force of mind, over any organized process of nature, such as death, and “instinct”, which in Truth directly undermines intellect and reason, and the organic right of technology to be used to overcome the injustices and flaws which nature is guilty of. But the validity of nature itself cannot be subverted and subordinated to lies or to deceit. The supernatural, in other words no imaginary illusion, can be allowed to exist on any equal or advanced level, to the natural. This is the law of nature, the only law of nature, that I exalt.

Our thoughtful Truth-seeker moves on to her next point: Begin quote: “On humans being result of unnatural mutation: there is nothing to suggest that humans evolved in a manner any less natural than other animals, thus the human is a “natural” creature. But being natural does not mean “moral” or “sane”, it simply means that it is the result of natural phenomenon. Mutations are never “unnatural” as they are the driving force behind a very natural process: evolution.” End quote.

Here a very vital and great Truth is being missed and rejected. Evolution is real, undeniable, and natural, but this has nothing to do with the human being existing as an unnatural birth defect, a genetically deformed mutation which must be understood as lacking the natural properties of other creatures. Immediately after this post, I will write out another post contrasting and detailing the profound differences, the profound failures, of the human being in direct comparison to all other animals. But it must be emphasized right here, that you are totally incorrect in your conclusion.

Life is naturally created via an evolutionary process which follows certain parameters. All other creatures exist within these parameters, even the caterpillar as he evolves to a butterfly. Only the human being defies these parameters, and the reason is because the human is a birth defect species, instead of a species which occasionally creates defective members, as is the case with all other animals. It is possible that a few other species originated as birth defects, but their functional symptoms are far less obvious and far less severe than that of the human. I cannot speak to this possibility with certainty, but I can be very certain, from the proof provided by the human evolutionary path dating back many thousands of years, that this specific species did not come into existence via the natural laws of evolution.

The proof that humans are genetically crippled and mutated, a species that should not have survived, much less come to rule over and impose upon other species of life, is in the ideological and behavioral choices made, and these choices express insanity, malformation of the brain and its function, on a level that no other animal comes close to matching. What humanity has done is transform the universe it inhabits into a horror show, by force and will of its own mind. This has nothing to do with survival, or killing for sustenance, or the natural instinct to breed and propagate. Humanity is genetically warped, an organic birth defect, primarily involving its brain and how it functions.

Of course humans came to exist because two creatures had sexual intercourse. But this does not render the human on a natural par with all other species. The original human was birthed as a radical departure from the two creatures who birthed him. He was different in a genetically deformed manner. He was different to the point where he should not have been able to find a mate, should not have been able to successfully reproduce. But nature is not perfect. Genetic birth defects sometimes survive and reproduce and they can result in an entirely new species being created. This is the human being, and this Forbidden Truth must be fully understood and integrated to conscious awareness. Humans do not make mistakes, humans are a mistake. Individual humans cannot be judged defective, because there is no sane standard by which to judge, as the species is itself foundationally, organically, defective.

Our Truth-seeking reader continues: Begin quote: “On cannibalism: you are absolutely right. I drove by a graveyard the other day and chuckled to myself, “These idiots”, I thought, “this land could go to some animals and plants; that meat could go to some starving humans, what a waste.” There is absolutely nothing wrong with the eating of newly dead body, and it would prevent the deaths of millions of creatures. Animals wouldn’t have to be slaughtered, and humans wouldn’t have to starve. But no, human insanity will not cease, not even for a minute.” End quote.

Yes, I am absolutely correct, and here you see the genetic inferiority of the human, shining through. Humans use their brain incorrectly. Humans cannot process ideas and experiences in a manner which reflects logic, order, sanity, or natural instinct. One human in a million appreciates the validity of cannibalism, that it should be occuring all the time. All humans who choose to eat meat should choose to consume human flesh, should recognize this meat as the most obvious and logical and appropriate choice, even more so because of the fact that they possess brains capable of rational, “higher” thought. But no, instead, it is one in a million, the tiny handful who have overcome their genetic brain deformity status.

To support and engage in cannibalism, as an eater of meat, is the most natural of choices, it should not even be open to controversy, if the human brain functioned normally. But instead it is absolutely taboo, must never even be considered, evokes horror and immediate condemnation to the very suggestion. This is because the human is genetically diseased and broken. He cannot see or accept himself as he is, much less understand the world which surrounds him.

The same organic derangement of mind, supplemented by relentless social brainwashing and indoctrination, which causes cannibalism to be demonized and rejected, is what causes Mandatory Parental Competency Testing, the elimination of punishment, the dissolution of religion and of government, and all other sane and logical reforms, to be judged insane and absurd and impossible and horrific. Every positive step forward is perceived as a horrific step backward, because the human functions within a devolutionary, regressive state of mind, the result of his organic birth defect status.

More thought-provoking comments from My reader: Begin quote: “On meat not being a main source of nutrition for humans: other primates have what’s called a cecum, which helps the animal break down cellulose (stores energy in plants) in vegetables. Humans do not have a functional cecum, which is why vegetables only yield little energy in the form of calories– we cannot break down cellulose. We can, however, break down glycogen (stores energy in animals) found in meat. Vegetable consumption should be higher in humans than meat consumption, but meat is still a necessary source of energy and amino acids (which create proteins in our body).”

The eating of food is a human weakness which should be overcome and eliminated. It is part of the overall spectrum of body dependency which modern era governments and societies are intent upon preserving and maintaining. As long as humans continue to obsess over eating food, they can never begin to focus upon the Forbidden Truth that they exist as brain, that all existence must be understood as brain-based.

Whatever difficulty humans may have in digesting plant proteins due to lack of a functional cecum, does not prevent humans who reject all meat from becoming and staying physically strong and healthy. Many high performance athletes reject all meat. The ability of humans to develop extremely large muscles while not eating any meat, is indicated by web sites such as this:


But I am not an advocate of vegetarianism. I am an advocate of eliminating the universal slavery of dependence upon food to live and to thrive, which is itself subordinate to My advocacy of the elimination of all body dependency, and the exaltation of the individual brain as the supreme and only definition of personal existence.

The barbarism of the human is proven by his refusal to eat human meat, or even to wait until animals die of old age or of natural causes before consuming them. Humans kill and eat animals to satiate homicidal rage and soothe other brain-based dysfunctions of mind causd by the suffering of personal trauma. The refusal of the human to embrace scientific research and progress towards eliminating food dependency, speaks to his pathology of mind.

Still more interesting thoughts from My reader: “On the use of weaponry and tools to hunt being “unnatural”: humans lack strength, all they have is stamina and the ability to make tools. Our “natural” hunting strategy was to chase down an animal until it got tired and kill it with a tool we created (ancestors used to use spears). All animals have the right to use whatever mental/physical faculties available to them to survive (humans are not the only creatures that use tools to survive) and humans need to use their tools to survive.”

Humans lack physical strength, a genetic weakness. But nature provided the human with the potential for brain-based intellegence, a genetic strength. But genetic weakness and genetic strength are both subordinate to genetic dysfunction, the birth defect status of the human being as a species. The instinct to personally survive is naturally strong, even in the defective human. Figuring out how to kill larger and stronger animals in order to survive, as the caveman and neanderthal did, is not something to judge or condemn now, in hindsight.

What should be understood and consciously dissected, is the fact that our “ancestors” earned and received extinction. The neanderthal is extinct, a failed species. The human of today is doomed to extinction, another failed species, because he cannot positively evolve. Humans do not need meat to survive, and as of today, they do not need food to survive. They need nutrients, which can be obtained in numerous ways. Yet they choose to eat meat and food, and to pathologically reject the elimination of food dependency, which would be a valuable, foundational step towards achieving technological immortality.

So what you have is the human of today using the intellectualized excuse that he needs to survive, to justify mass murder and genocide of animals, trees, and plants, but in Truth he is assuring his own death by choosing to perceive himself as a body instead of a mind, and by pathologically clinging to unnecessary dependency upon his own physical body.

My female reader, she chose to mention this distinction, continues: Begin quote: “Cognition as it relates to animals and plants: you have mentioned that since a plant does not have a brain, the murder of the creature is less of an injustice. I disagree, because if one were to apply that same logic to fetuses, you consequently show abortion to be less of an injustice than the murder of a fully grown adult being. The fetus has no brain, thus it is not self aware, and cannot be aware of its own existence and the consequences that arise from loss of said existence. Therefore, the killing of a fetus while it has no brain is now more ethical than the killing of an adult human, which We all know to be false, given the insanity displayed by the adult human and the relative purity of the fetus. I think that to avoid this logical inconsistency, the murder of plants and animals must be considered ethical equals, as they both result in the same injustice. However, since the killing of plants is more inescapable and more necessary to the sustenance of personal life than the killing of animals, the killing of plants will be seen as more morally justified.” End quote.

The murder of a plant is less of an injustice than the murder of an animal, because of the capacity of the animal to consciously perceive its own existence. Injustice and suffering must be understood as personal experiences, above and beyond a detached, external judgment of morality, ethics, or entitlement. This distinction is valid, but it does not render the intentional physical destruction of a tree or plant by a human, any less murderous than such destruction of an animal.

The term “murder” is equally appropriate, and carries the same weight, just as must be the case with every act of human murder, rendering all labels such as “abortion” or “death penalty” or euthanasia”, utterly invalid and constituting deliberate attempt to reject the reality and Truth of the atrocity being carried out. Your claim that the murder of a human fetus is being rendered comparable to the murder of a plant, by My expressed logic, is invalid. A six week old fetus is already functioning as a brain as demonstrated by neuron firing. Therefore a six week old fetus already possesses a brain, that no plant or tree can or will possess. But even more primarily, every fetus-trapped human being will develop a brain just as complex and potentially brilliant as mine, unless it ceases to exist, and abortion is the act of murder which causes the fetus-trapped human being to cease to exist. Therefore every act of abortion constitutes the proactive murder of a human brain, even if the brain itself has not fully formed, or has not even formed at all, which only applies to fetuses under 6 weeks of age.

More thoughts not from My brilliant mind: Begin quote: “On food as source of comfort and catharsis: one can only expect such insanity from a species that declares “happiness” as the highest good. People will do anything– anything– to feel comfortable. They are even willing to murder other species, species whose livelihoods are already being threatened by humanity, to keep that sadistic smile on their faces. And like you said, the act of murder in and of itself isn’t the problem, it’s the fact that they do sadistic things and still claim some sort of moral high ground.”

Correct, and well-stated. Comfort of mind is the subconscious obsession of all inferior humans. And comfort of mind must involve the hypocritical rejection of Truth, because within the realm of conscious embrace of Forbidden Truth, comfort of mind cannot be created, established, or maintained, it is simply not possible. The human exists as pathological addict to whatever comforts him, whatever allows him to reject, deny, and escape from the reality of the horrors of his own existence, as it plays out in real-time.

An extremely important point to note, is how comfort of mind always comes at a great cost. It comes at the cost of suffering physical pain, illness, and death. It comes at the cost of sacrificing all potential, personally and as a species, to attain any great triumph, such as technological immortality. Comfort of mind is one of the greatest of all human horrors, and it manifests in so many different ways. Inferiors love to harm their own bodies, destroy themselves in so many different ways, all because they are cowards who cannot face the Truths they are guilty of creating and sponsoring.

And our aspiring Superior, hopefully not a high heeled shoe addict, concludes with: Begin quote:

“On Soylent: I read about this when it first came out in the markets back in March, and I’m glad you mentioned it– one can now literally get all their nutrients without the direct murder of any living thing! If unnecessary murder can be prevented, it should. I remember commenting on the news article and remarking about how amazing such an advancement was. As you can imagine, every other commenter went on about how food is valuable because it defines cultures and comforts people; I received no support in the comment section and instead got voted down into oblivion. The utter stupidity of the human race was once more demonstrated to me before my own eyes. Humans talk about peace and being kind to others and staying away from creating unnecessary suffering, yet they are willing to murder others to keep their precious cultures alive and comfort themselves. Humans are so emotionally unstable that they kill others for comfort, yet in the same breath they accuse others of being insane. It’s sad, really.” End quote.

Yes, sad and pathetic. How do you blame a genetically diseased and broken species for its horrific failures? And yet we must blame. Why? Just look at Me! I was born human. I still possess a human brain. No extraterrestrial has enhanced My brain functionality via technology. And yet I have risen above, to see Truth, to know Truth, to embrace Truth. And so the genetic failure of the inferiors must be understood as partially their fault, partially the result of their cowardice, their refusal to even try to overcome their malfunctioning brains. I have achieved triumph of mind. You and a tiny handful of others seem to be trying to embrace Truth. But the vast majority will never try, never! And this is why humanity as a species must be condemned. It deserves no mercy, it is a collective failure, evidenced by billions of individual failures. Not failing because they have tried unsuccessfully, but failing because they refuse to try, because they cannot even begin to imagine trying.

Regarding Soylent, it is important to note that balanced nutrition that can essentially meet all physical needs absent food consumption, was developed and has been commercially available, for decades. One excellent example is Nutrament. This nutritional “supplement” was developed in the 1950’s and has been commercially available since 1960! It is a completely balanced alternative food source, each 12 ounce can supplying 32% of protein RDA, and 35% of 24 other vitamins and minerals. But of course it is has never been marketed as a food replacement. The same company that makes it, makes food! And of course government will not allow any company to market any product as a “food replacement” for the general population. Food addiction is just as vital as god addiction and money addiction, for the slave state.

You can read about Nutrament Here:


And here:


Soylent is nothing new. The very fact it generated publicity as something new and radical in 2014, when the scientific knowledge inspiring it has been established for decades, speaks to how effectively governments conceal any and all scientific advancements and discoveries, at their malicious will.

It is good that you have had bad experiences in attempting to enlighten humans to Truth. I say it is good because such negative experiences teach important lessons, enlighten the seeking mind to additional Forbidden Truths, such as the hopelessness of the human condition. The insanity of humanity as a species, is a vitally important Forbidden Truth to fully realize, and yet none of the inferiors do so. It takes an aspiring Superior such as yourself, to repeatedly attempt to enlighten others, and to repeatedly be rebuffed, condemned, ridiculed, and demonized as direct response, to come to the realization of the organic insanity, and inherent hopelessness, of humanity.

All text not italicized is © Copyright 2014-2064 The Seer of Forbidden Truth. All Rights Reserved.


  1. I have to say I was surprised to see this
    “The barbarism of the human is proven by his refusal to eat human meat” even tho I recall seeing it in your manifesto at a few points. I can see your point, but I would think such a hater of humanity wouldn’t want to touch a human let a lone eat one.

    Pretty gross if you ask me. Humans are nasty and are riddled with diseases, way more than animals if you ask me. Wouldn’t any sickness that a human had also be easily transmitted to the eater since they’re from the same species?


    1. The eating of human flesh is the civilized alternative, available to the human eater of meat. Personally, at this point in time, I would not choose to consume human flesh, and I eat a great deal of flesh from other animals. But I have transcended My humanity. I do not need to engage in symbolic, token gestures, but the humans do. Those who claim authority to rule over this world, as they sponsor its destruction, must be held accountable for their deranged hypocrisy.

      Cannibalism can legitimately occur as an act of power exerted by a torture victim over his chosen prey. Murder, followed by cannibalistic consumption, can constitute an act of cathartic vengeance. But as is the case with most everything humans do, it is much more often inspired by a desire to possess others, to integrate rather than to detach.

      There are valid reasons to choose not to eat human flesh, but anyone who chooses to eat the flesh of other animals while specifically excluding the human, is violating these very same reasons, and engaging in an activity more perverse and morally indefensible. If you want to limit your human meat consumption to disease-free meat, create an organization whose job it is to monitor and determine the relative purity of each human corpse, immediately upon death. Condemning and outlawing the consumption of human flesh, while promoting and sanctifying the consumption of specific forms of animal flesh, represents the pure hypocrisy and functional derangement of the broken and destroyed human animal.

      If the human were functionally sane, the same digust and revulsion that you feel and express regarding the consumption of human flesh, would be universally applied, as cultural mandate, to the consumption of animal flesh.


You have just read something brilliant. You can comment on it here. All comments are screened prior to publication.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s